Effects of physicochemical characteristics of feed ingredients on the apparent total tract digestibility of energy, DM, and nutrients by growing pigs
- PMID: 29688508
- PMCID: PMC6095346
- DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky149
Effects of physicochemical characteristics of feed ingredients on the apparent total tract digestibility of energy, DM, and nutrients by growing pigs
Abstract
Effects of physicochemical characteristics of feed ingredients on DE and ME and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of GE, DM, and nutrients were determined in growing pigs using ingredients with different ratios between insoluble dietary fiber (IDF) and soluble dietary fiber (SDF). Eighty growing barrows (BW: 48.41 ± 1.50 kg) were allotted to a randomized complete block design with 10 diets and eight replicate pigs per diet. Dietary treatments included a corn-based diet, a wheat-based diet, a corn-soybean meal (SBM) diet, and seven diets based on a mixture of the corn-SBM diet and canola meal, distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS), corn germ meal (CGM), copra expellers, sugar beet pulp (SBP), synthetic cellulose, or pectin. Values for the ATTD of DM and nutrients were also compared with the in vitro digestibility of GE, DM, and nutrients. Results indicated that the ATTD of GE was greater (P < 0.05) in wheat than in canola meal, DDGS, CGM, copra expellers, SBP, and synthetic cellulose, but not different from corn, SBM, or pectin. SBM had greater (P < 0.05) DE and ME (DM basis) compared with all other ingredients. The concentration of ME (DM basis) was greater (P < 0.05) in wheat than in canola meal, DDGS, CGM, copra expellers, SBP, synthetic cellulose, and pectin, but not different from corn. Stronger correlations between total dietary fiber (TDF) and DE and ME than between ADF or NDF and DE and ME were observed, indicating that TDF can be used to more accurately predict DE and ME than values for NDF or ADF. The DE, ME, and the ATTD of DM in ingredients were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with in vitro ATTD of DM, indicating that the in vitro procedure may be used to estimate DE and ME in feed ingredients. Swelling and water-binding capacity were positively correlated (P < 0.05) with the ATTD of IDF, TDF, nonstarch polysaccharides (NSP), and insoluble NSP, and viscosity was positively correlated (P < 0.05) with the ATTD of NDF, IDF, and insoluble NSP, indicating that some physical characteristics may influence digestibility of fiber. However, physical characteristics of feed ingredients were not correlated with the concentration of DE and ME, which indicates that these parameters do not influence in vivo energy digestibility in feed ingredients. It is concluded that the DE and ME in feed ingredients may be predicted from some chemical constituents and from in vitro digestibility of DM, but not from physical characteristics.
Similar articles
-
Analysis for low-molecular-weight carbohydrates is needed to account for all energy-contributing nutrients in some feed ingredients, but physical characteristics do not predict in vitro digestibility of dry matter.J Anim Sci. 2018 Mar 6;96(2):532-544. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky010. J Anim Sci. 2018. PMID: 29385488 Free PMC article.
-
Digestibility of energy and detergent fiber and digestible and metabolizable energy values in canola meal, 00-rapeseed meal, and 00-rapeseed expellers fed to growing pigs.J Anim Sci. 2015 Feb;93(2):652-60. doi: 10.2527/jas.2014-7792. J Anim Sci. 2015. PMID: 26020750
-
The contribution of digestible and metabolizable energy from high-fiber dietary ingredients is not affected by inclusion rate in mixed diets fed to growing pigs.J Anim Sci. 2018 May 4;96(5):1860-1868. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky090. J Anim Sci. 2018. PMID: 29534181 Free PMC article.
-
Board-invited review: the use and application of distillers dried grains with solubles in swine diets.J Anim Sci. 2009 Apr;87(4):1292-303. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1290. Epub 2008 Nov 21. J Anim Sci. 2009. PMID: 19028847 Review.
-
Xylanase supplementation in corn-based swine diets: a review with emphasis on potential mechanisms of action.J Anim Sci. 2020 Nov 1;98(11):skaa318. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa318. J Anim Sci. 2020. PMID: 32970148 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Metabolizable energy and apparent total tract digestibility of energy and nutrients differ among samples of sunflower meal and sunflower expellers fed to growing pigs.J Anim Sci. 2023 Jan 3;101:skad117. doi: 10.1093/jas/skad117. J Anim Sci. 2023. PMID: 37084794 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Extrusion on the Available Energy and Nutrient Digestibility of Soybean Meal and Its Application in Weaned Piglets.Animals (Basel). 2024 Nov 21;14(23):3355. doi: 10.3390/ani14233355. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39682322 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Yeast Culture Supplementation in Wheat-Rice-Based Diet on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, and Gut Microbiota of Growing-Finishing Pigs.Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;12(17):2177. doi: 10.3390/ani12172177. Animals (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36077898 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of multienzyme supplementation on energy and nutrient digestibility in various feed ingredients for pregnant gilts.J Anim Sci. 2025 Jan 4;103:skaf017. doi: 10.1093/jas/skaf017. J Anim Sci. 2025. PMID: 39878943 Free PMC article.
-
Dietary isoacids effects on growth, nitrogen, and energy digestibility, and fecal volatile fatty acids and microbial ecology in finishing pigs.J Anim Sci. 2024 Jan 3;102:skae170. doi: 10.1093/jas/skae170. J Anim Sci. 2024. PMID: 38902915 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adeola O. 2001. Digestion and balance techniques in pigs. In: A. J. Lewis and L. L. Southern, editors, Swine nutrition. 2nd ed CRC Press, New York, NY: p. 903–916.
-
- Anderson P. V., Kerr B. J., Weber T. E., Ziemer C. J., and Shurson G. C.. 2012. Determination and prediction of digestible and metabolizable energy from chemical analysis of corn coproducts fed to finishing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 90:1242–1254. doi:10.2527/jas.2010–3605 - PubMed
-
- Bach Knudsen K. E., Lærke H. N., and Jørgensen H.. 2013. Carbohydrate and carbohydrate utilization in swine. In: L. I., Chiba, editor, Sustainable swine nutrition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Ames, IA: p. 109–137. doi:10.1002/9781118491454.ch5
-
- Berrocoso J. D., Rojas O. J., Liu Y., Shoulders J., González-Vega J. C., and Stein H. H.. 2015. Energy concentration and amino acid digestibility in high-protein canola meal, conventional canola meal, and soybean meal fed to growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 93:2208–2217. doi:10.2527/jas.2014–8528 - PubMed
-
- Bolarinwa O. A. and Adeola O.. 2016. Regression and direct methods do not give different estimates of digestible and metabolizable energy values of barley, sorghum, and wheat for pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 94:610–618. doi:10.2527/jas.2015-9766 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials