Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0196350.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196350. eCollection 2018.

Higher expression of miR-133b is associated with better efficacy of erlotinib as the second or third line in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Affiliations

Higher expression of miR-133b is associated with better efficacy of erlotinib as the second or third line in non-small cell lung cancer patients

Alessandra Bisagni et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib) are indicated as first-line therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors harbor activating mutations in the EGFR gene. Erlotinib is also used in second and third-line therapy for patients whose tumors have wild type EGFR but to date there are no validated biomarkers useful to identify which patients may benefit from this treatment. The expression level of four miRNAs: miR-133b, -146a, -7 and -21 which target EGFR was investigated by real-time PCR in tumor specimens from NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib administered as the second or third line. We found that miR-133b expression level better discriminated responder from non-responder patients to erlotinib. Higher levels of miR-133b in NSCLCs were associated with longer progression-free survival time of patients. Functional analyses on miR-133b through transfection of a miR-133b mimic in A549 and H1299 NSCLC cell lines indicated that increasing miR-133b expression level led to a decreased cell growth and altered morphology but did not affect sensitivity to erlotinib. The detection of miR-133b expression levels in tumors help in the identification of NSCLC patients with a better prognosis and who are likely to benefit from second and third-line therapy with erlotinib.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. MiRNAs expression in relation to response to erlotinib.
A Analysis of miRNA expression was investigated using TaqMan real-time quantitative PCR in NSCLC specimen from "responders" (n = 8) and "non-responders" patients (n = 24). Results are shown as normalized expression: 2−ΔCt compared with Mann-Whitney test. B ROC curve analysis of miRNA levels to predict response to erlotinib. AUC = Area Under the Curve; CI = Confidence Interval; Thr = Threshold; Se = Sensitivity; Sp = Specificity.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Effects of miR-133b in combination to erlotinib on NSCLC cell lines.
Cells were seeded at 1.5 x 105 cells/well and cultured up to 72 hours. Data are presented as mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. A Cell growth relative to lipofectamine-treated cells. B Photographs of A549 and H1299 after 72 h treatment. Magnification 400X. C Cell shape measured as forward scatter (FSC) shown on the top and side scatter (SSC) shown on the bottom. Note that the axes in each diagram are displayed in relative percent scale. *p<0.05 by the one sample t test with hypothetical value = 100.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Effects of mir-133b and erlotinib on EGFR and EGFR pathway.
A Flow cytometry to evaluate EGFR surface expression. Expression relative to lipofectamine treated cells is shown (mean ± SEM of three independent experiments is shown). *p<0.05 by the one sample t test with hypothetical value = 100. B Western blot assay to detect total EGFR, total ERK, GAPDH and phosphorylated ERK. Cropped blots are displayed. Full length blots are showed in S1 Fig. Exposure time: EGFR 200 sec, GAPDH 90 sec, pERK 420 sec, total EGFR 90 sec.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Travis WD, Brembilla E, Nicholson AG, Yatabe Y, Austin JH, Beasley MB, et al. The 2015 World Health Organization Classification of Lung Tumors: Impact of Genetic, Clinical and Radiologic Advances Since the 2004 Classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;10(9):1243–60. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000630 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma SV, Bell D, Settleman J, Haber DA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(3):169–81. doi: 10.1038/nrc2088 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sequist LV, Joshi V, Jänne PA, Muzikansky A, Fidias P, Meyerson M, et al. Response to treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing somatic EGFR mutation testing. Oncologist. 2007;12(1):90–8. - PubMed
    1. Korpanty GJ, Graham D, Vincent MD, Leighl NB. Biomarkers That Currently Affect Clinical Practice in Lung Cancer: EGFR, ALK, MET, ROS-1, and KRAS. Front Oncol. 2014;11(4):204. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Muhsin M, Graham J, Kirkpatrick P. Gefitinib. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2(7):515–6. doi: 10.1038/nrd1136 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms