Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018:46:66-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2018.04.003. Epub 2018 Apr 9.

Ingested foreign body mimicking acute appendicitis

Jeremy M Reeves  1 , Michael D Wade  2 , John Edwards  3
Affiliations

Ingested foreign body mimicking acute appendicitis

Jeremy M Reeves et al. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2018.

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of acute appendicitis is approximately 250,000 cases per year in the United States with a lifetime risk of 7% (Gupta & Dupuy, 1997). However, despite strongly associated clinical signs, diagnostic accuracy based on history and physical exam alone is only 70% (Jess et al., 1981). This is in large part due to the multitude of mimics found in the differential diagnosis of appendicitis. As a result highly sensitive imaging such as computed tomography scan has become standard of care.

Presentation of case: We present a case of an otherwise healthy 20year old male presenting to the emergency department with acute onset of right lower quadrant pain and leukocytosis consistent with a diagnosis of appendicitis. Ultrasonography was grossly negative as was a computed tomography scan. Given the peritoneal nature of the patient's abdominal exam, general surgery was consulted. The patient was taken for exploratory laparoscopy where a long, thin, metallic foreign body was found to have perforated the small intestine.

Discussion: Discussion includes a literature review of computed tomography negative appendicitis, as well as the frequency of foreign body mimicking appendicitis. This case demonstrates the importance of the clinical exam even in the face of negative highly sensitive imaging modalities.

Conclusion: In conclusion, there are several mimics of acute appendicitis and we present an unusual case of a foreign body mimicking this disorder in a young person. Highly sensitive imaging coupled with history and physical examination remains the standard of care for diagnosing appendicitis; however, clinical acumen must be utilized to formulate a broad differential.

Keywords: Acute abdomen; Appendicitis; Foreign body ingestion; General surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Surgical resected specimen with visualized penetrating foreign body.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Surgical specimen of foreign body perforation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Gupta H., Dupuy D.E. Advances in imaging of the acute abdomen. Surg. Clin. North Am. 1997;77(6):1245–1263. - PubMed
    1. Jess P. Acute appendicitis: prospective trial concerning diagnostic accuracy and complications. Am. J. Surg. 1981;141(2):232–234. - PubMed
    1. Cope Z.S., William . 22nd ed. Oxford University Press; New York: 2010. Cope’s Early Diagnosis of the Acute Abdomen.
    1. Addiss D.G. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1990;132(5):910–925. - PubMed
    1. Pickhardt P.J. Diagnostic performance of multidetector computed tomography for suspected acute appendicitis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2011;154(12):789–796. W-291. - PubMed