Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2018 Apr 24;13(1):60.
doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0752-7.

Implementation of evidence-based weekend service recommendations for allied health managers: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Implementation of evidence-based weekend service recommendations for allied health managers: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol

Mitchell N Sarkies et al. Implement Sci. .

Abstract

Background: It is widely acknowledged that health policy and practice do not always reflect current research evidence. Whether knowledge transfer from research to practice is more successful when specific implementation approaches are used remains unclear. A model to assist engagement of allied health managers and clinicians with research implementation could involve disseminating evidence-based policy recommendations, along with the use of knowledge brokers. We developed such a model to aid decision-making for the provision of weekend allied health services. This protocol outlines the design and methods for a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the success of research implementation strategies to promote evidence-informed weekend allied health resource allocation decisions, especially in hospital managers.

Methods: This multi-centre study will be a three-group parallel cluster randomised controlled trial. Allied health managers from Australian and New Zealand hospitals will be randomised to receive either (1) an evidence-based policy recommendation document to guide weekend allied health resource allocation decisions, (2) the same policy recommendation document with support from a knowledge broker to help implement weekend allied health policy recommendations, or (3) a usual practice control group. The primary outcome will be alignment of weekend allied health service provision with policy recommendations. This will be measured by the number of allied health service events (occasions of service) occurring on weekends as a proportion of total allied health service events for the relevant hospital wards at baseline and 12-month follow-up.

Discussion: Evidence-based policy recommendation documents communicate key research findings in an accessible format. This comparatively low-cost research implementation strategy could be combined with using a knowledge broker to work collaboratively with decision-makers to promote knowledge transfer. The results will assist managers to make decisions on resource allocation, based on evidence. More generally, the findings will inform the development of an allied health model for translating research into practice.

Trial registration: This trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) ( ACTRN12618000029291 ). Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1205-2621.

Keywords: Allied health; Decision-making; Evidence; Evidence-informed decision-making; Implementation; Knowledge broker; Recommendation; Research; Resource allocation; Weekend.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors’ information

Mitchell Sarkies is a Physiotherapist from Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, with an interest in translating research into practice. He is currently a Ph.D. candidate at Monash University.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Project investigators declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT study flow diagram

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grol R. Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice. Med Care. 2001;39(8):II-46–II-54. - PubMed
    1. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7182):527–530. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Slade SC, Philip K, Morris ME. Frameworks for embedding a research culture in allied health practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2018;16(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0304-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hyder AA, Bloom G, Leach M, Syed SB, Peters DH, Future Health Systems: Innovations for E Exploring health systems research and its influence on policy processes in low income countries. BMC Public Health. 2007;7:309. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-309. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lane H, Sarkies M, Martin J, Haines T. Equity in healthcare resource allocation decision making: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2016;175:11–27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.12.012. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources