[Comparison of intravenous thrombolysis and intracoronary thrombolysis]
- PMID: 2969095
[Comparison of intravenous thrombolysis and intracoronary thrombolysis]
Abstract
Any comparison between intravenous and intracoronary thrombolysis must take into account such elements as the delays imposed by coronary arteriography, the extra cost of the procedure, etc., but ultimately the answer can only be provided by a controlled trial comparing the two approaches. To give truly significant results, this trial should fulfill several requirements concerning the time of randomization to treatments, the procedure to be followed in each group and the criteria of comparison. No such trial is available at present, so that the comparison can only rest on speculations and less demonstrative facts. As it stands, it is not in favour of intracoronary thrombolysis.
Similar articles
-
Thrombolytic therapy for acute coronary thrombosis.Eur Heart J. 1987 Sep;8 Suppl F:78-87. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/8.suppl_f.78. Eur Heart J. 1987. PMID: 3311764 Review. No abstract available.
-
Coronary thrombolysis with intravenous streptokinase.Cardiol Clin. 1987 Feb;5(1):91-9. Cardiol Clin. 1987. PMID: 3548977 Review.
-
[Intracoronary thrombolysis. Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty].Vutr Boles. 1984;23(2):21-30. Vutr Boles. 1984. PMID: 6234707 Bulgarian. No abstract available.
-
Coronary thrombolysis.Chest. 1989 Feb;95(2 Suppl):73S-87S. doi: 10.1378/chest.95.2_supplement.73s. Chest. 1989. PMID: 2644105 Review. No abstract available.
-
Coronary thrombolysis.Q J Med. 1988 Sep;68(257):657-63. Q J Med. 1988. PMID: 2978484 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials