Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018
- PMID: 29691276
- PMCID: PMC6145289
- DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316276
Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018
Erratum in
-
Correction: Asia-Pacific working group consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: an update 2018.Gut. 2019 Feb;68(2):380. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316276corr1. Gut. 2019. PMID: 30622119 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding remains an important emergency condition, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. As endoscopic therapy is the 'gold standard' of management, treatment of these patients can be considered in three stages: pre-endoscopic treatment, endoscopic haemostasis and post-endoscopic management. Since publication of the Asia-Pacific consensus on non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) 7 years ago, there have been significant advancements in the clinical management of patients in all three stages. These include pre-endoscopy risk stratification scores, blood and platelet transfusion, use of proton pump inhibitors; during endoscopy new haemostasis techniques (haemostatic powder spray and over-the-scope clips); and post-endoscopy management by second-look endoscopy and medication strategies. Emerging techniques, including capsule endoscopy and Doppler endoscopic probe in assessing adequacy of endoscopic therapy, and the pre-emptive use of angiographic embolisation, are attracting new attention. An emerging problem is the increasing use of dual antiplatelet agents and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with cardiac and cerebrovascular diseases. Guidelines on the discontinuation and then resumption of these agents in patients presenting with NVUGIB are very much needed. The Asia-Pacific Working Group examined recent evidence and recommends practical management guidelines in this updated consensus statement.
Keywords: endoscopy; gastrointestinal bleeding.
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: None declared.
References
-
- Martínez-Cara JG, Jiménez-Rosales R, Úbeda-Muñoz M, et al. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford score, and Rockall score in a European series of patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: performance when predicting in-hospital and delayed mortality. United European Gastroenterol J 2016;4:371–9. 10.1177/2050640615604779 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials