Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 25;9(4):148.
doi: 10.1038/s41424-018-0014-7.

Primary care colorectal cancer screening correlates with breast cancer screening: implications for colorectal cancer screening improvement interventions

Affiliations

Primary care colorectal cancer screening correlates with breast cancer screening: implications for colorectal cancer screening improvement interventions

Jennifer M Weiss et al. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Objective: National colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates have plateaued. To optimize interventions targeting those unscreened, a better understanding is needed of how this preventive service fits in with multiple preventive and chronic care needs managed by primary care providers (PCPs). This study examines whether PCP practices of other preventive and chronic care needs correlate with CRC screening.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 90 PCPs and 33,137 CRC screening-eligible patients. Five PCP quality metrics (breast cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, HgbA1c and LDL testing, and blood pressure control) were measured. A baseline correlation test was performed between these metrics and PCP CRC screening rates. Multivariable logistic regression with clustering at the clinic-level estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for these PCP quality metrics, patient and PCP characteristics, and their relationship to CRC screening.

Results: PCP CRC screening rates have a strong correlation with breast cancer screening rates (r = 0.7414, p < 0.001) and a weak correlation with the other quality metrics. In the final adjusted model, the only PCP quality metric that significantly predicted CRC screening was breast cancer screening (OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.11-1.42; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: PCP CRC screening rates are highly concordant with breast cancer screening. CRC screening is weakly concordant with cervical cancer screening and chronic disease management metrics. Efforts targeting PCPs to increase CRC screening rates could be bundled with breast cancer screening improvement interventions to increase their impact and success.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Guarantor of the article: Jennifer Weiss, MD, MS.

Specific author contributions: Jennifer Weiss and Maureen Smith (involved in all aspects of the manuscript); Aaron Potvien (data analysis and interpretation of data); Sally Kraft and Nancy Pandhi (study concept and design, acquisition and interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content); Pascale Carayon (study concept and design, interpretation of data, critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content). All authors approved the final draft submitted.

Financial support: Funding for this study was provided by the University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center (UWCCC) from the National Cancer Institute, grant number P30 CA014520; the Community-Academic Partnerships core of the University of Wisconsin Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (UW ICTR) through the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), grant UL1TR000427; an American Cancer Society Mentored Research Scholar Grant in Applied and Clinical Research, grant MRSG-13-144-01-CPHPS; grant R01 CA144835 from the National Cancer Institute; and the UW Health Innovation Program. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Potential competing interests: None.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use--United States, 2012. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 2013;62:881–888. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Phillips L, et al. Improving breast and colon cancer screening rates: a comparison of letters, automated phone calls, or both. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2015;28:46–54. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140174. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levy BT, et al. A randomized controlled trial to improve colon cancer screening in rural family medicine: an Iowa Research Network (IRENE) study. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 2013;26:486–497. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130041. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Myers RE, et al. Behavioral interventions to increase adherence in colorectal-cancer screening. Med Care. 1991;29:1039–1050. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199110000-00009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types