Acceptability and feasibility of a Fitbit physical activity monitor for endometrial cancer survivors
- PMID: 29692337
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.04.560
Acceptability and feasibility of a Fitbit physical activity monitor for endometrial cancer survivors
Abstract
Objective: Endometrial cancer survivors are the least physically active of all cancer survivor groups and exhibit up to 70% obesity. While studies suggest lifestyle interventions result in improved health outcomes, recruitment and availability of these programs are limited. The purpose was to evaluate the acceptability and validity of the Fitbit Alta™ physical activity monitor (Fitbit) for socioculturally diverse endometrial cancer survivors.
Methods: Thirty endometrial cancer survivors were given wrist-worn Fitbits to wear for 30 days. Participants then returned the Fitbits, completed the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire (GLTEQ), Technology Acceptance Questionnaire, and answered qualitative prompts. Correlations between daily Fitbit step counts, demographic factors, body mass index (BMI), and GLTEQ Index, were analyzed using Stata 13.0. Concordance Correlation Coefficient using U statistics was used to examine convergent validity.
Results: Twenty-five participants completed the study. Mean age was 62 ± 9 years. Mean BMI was 32 ± 9 kg·m-2. Self-identified race/ethnicity was 36% Hispanic, 36% non-Hispanic white, 16% non-Hispanic black and 12% Asian. Participants wore the Fitbits a median of 93% of possible days. Median daily Fitbit step count was 5325 (IQR: 3761-8753). Mean Technology Acceptance score was 2.8 ± 0.5 out of 4.0. Younger (<65 years) and employed participants were more likely to achieve at least 6000 daily steps (p < 0.05). There was no correlation (CCC = 0.00, p = 0.99) between step count and GLTEQ Index. Most free responses reflected positive experiences.
Conclusions: The Fitbits were well accepted in this sample. Self-reported physical activity was not associated with steps recorded. The physical activity data indicate an insufficiently active population.
Keywords: Endometrial cancer; Fitbit; Obesity; Physical activity tracker; Wearable technology.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Usability and Implementation Considerations of Fitbit and App Intervention for Diverse Cancer Survivors: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 24;11:e60034. doi: 10.2196/60034. JMIR Cancer. 2025. PMID: 39993013 Free PMC article.
-
Fitbit wear-time and patterns of activity in cancer survivors throughout a physical activity intervention and follow-up: Exploratory analysis from a randomised controlled trial.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 19;15(10):e0240967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240967. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33075100 Free PMC article.
-
Physical activity-related differences in body mass index and patient-reported quality of life in socioculturally diverse endometrial cancer survivors.Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jul;25(7):2169-2177. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3622-y. Epub 2017 Feb 16. Support Care Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28210862
-
Advantages and Limitations of Wearable Activity Trackers: Considerations for Patients and Clinicians.Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016 Dec 1;20(6):606-610. doi: 10.1188/16.CJON.606-610. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2016. PMID: 27857250 Review.
-
Use of Fitbit Devices in Physical Activity Intervention Studies Across the Life Course: Narrative Review.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 28;9(5):e23411. doi: 10.2196/23411. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021. PMID: 34047705 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Increasing physical activity levels following treatment for cervical cancer: an intervention mapping approach.J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Jun;16(3):650-658. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01058-y. Epub 2021 May 26. J Cancer Surviv. 2022. PMID: 34041674 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Activity Tracker-Based Metrics as Digital Markers of Cardiometabolic Health in Working Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jan 31;8(1):e16409. doi: 10.2196/16409. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020. PMID: 32012098 Free PMC article.
-
Older adults' experiences of using a wearable activity tracker with health professional feedback over a 12-month randomised controlled trial.Digit Health. 2020 Apr 26;6:2055207620921678. doi: 10.1177/2055207620921678. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2020. PMID: 32426152 Free PMC article.
-
Harnessing consumer smartphone and wearable sensors for clinical cancer research.NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Oct 27;3:140. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00351-x. eCollection 2020. NPJ Digit Med. 2020. PMID: 33134557 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Feasibility of Fitness Tracker Usage to Assess Activity Level and Toxicities in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021 Jan;5:125-133. doi: 10.1200/CCI.20.00117. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2021. PMID: 33492994 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical