Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct-Dec;7(4):182-187.
doi: 10.4103/jphi.JPHI_90_17.

Drug information center as referral service in a South Indian tertiary care hospital

Affiliations

Drug information center as referral service in a South Indian tertiary care hospital

Sapan Kumar Behera et al. Int J Pharm Investig. 2017 Oct-Dec.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the various aspects of drug information services (DISs) provided in the DI center of a tertiary care hospital.

Materials and methods: DI queries received from various departments from April 2013 to May 2017 were included in the study. Various aspects such as year- and department-wise distribution, reason for sending the queries, mode of receipt and reply, time taken for reply, number of visit for bedside examination of patients, and number of references given per query were analyzed. All the results are expressed in numbers and percentages.

Results: Fifty-five DI queries were received during the study period. Most of the queries were received from Department of Orthopedics (26, 47.27%), followed by Neurology (4, 7.27%). Most common mode of receipt of queries (41, 74.55%) was by Cross-reference form not case record form followed by phone calls (8, 14.55%) and outpatient department (OPD) case sheet (6, 10.9%). CRF with attached opinion was the most common mode of reply (41, 74.55%) followed by phone calls (7, 12.73%), and OPD case sheets (6, 10.9%). The most common reason for sending queries was antimicrobials-related problem (25, 45.46%), followed by the use of anticoagulants (13, 23.63%). Most of the queries were replied within 24 h (31, 56.36%), followed by 48 h (14, 25.45%). Out of 41 CRF received for in-patients, bedside examination was requested in 23 (56.09%) CRF. There was an increasing trend in the number of queries received every year with more queries received during 2016 (23, 41.82%).

Conclusions: DIS if utilized properly can be used as a referral service such as other specialties in a tertiary care hospital.

Keywords: Adverse drug reaction; cross-reference form; drug information query; drug information service; mode of receipt.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Year-wise distribution of queries

References

    1. Bingham JM, Matthews H, Saunders A, Vernon G, Foran S, Whyte R, et al. SHPA standard for practice of drug information services. Aust J Hosp Pharm. 1999;29:171–6.
    1. Bhavsar R, Zachariah S, Thomas D, Kannan SM. Evaluation and appraisal of drug information services in a rural secondary level care hospital, Anantapur, AP. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2012;4:302–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pradeep P, Varma AS, Mounika S, Durga GL, Kumar MP, Kumar MV, et al. Retrospective study to analyse and evaluate drug information query services provided by clinical pharmacisits at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Pharm Innov J. 2015;4:36–9.
    1. Chauhan N, Moin S, Pandey A, Mittal A, Bajaj U. Indian aspects of drug information resources and impact of drug information centre on community. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2013;4:84–93. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reppe LA, Spigset O, Schjøtt J. Which factors predict the time spent answering queries to a drug information centre? Pharm World Sci. 2010;32:799–804. - PMC - PubMed