Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Apr 25;10(5):218.
doi: 10.3390/v10050218.

Framing the Future with Bacteriophages in Agriculture

Antonet Svircev  1 , Dwayne Roach  2 , Alan Castle  3
Affiliations
Review

Framing the Future with Bacteriophages in Agriculture

Antonet Svircev et al. Viruses. .

Abstract

The ability of agriculture to continually provide food to a growing world population is of crucial importance. Bacterial diseases of plants and animals have continually reduced production since the advent of crop cultivation and animal husbandry practices. Antibiotics have been used extensively to mitigate these losses. The rise of antimicrobial resistant (AMR) bacteria, however, together with consumers’ calls for antibiotic-free products, presents problems that threaten sustainable agriculture. Bacteriophages (phages) are proposed as bacterial population control alternatives to antibiotics. Their unique properties make them highly promising but challenging antimicrobials. The use of phages in agriculture also presents a number of unique challenges. This mini-review summarizes recent development and perspectives of phages used as antimicrobial agents in plant and animal agriculture at the farm level. The main pathogens and their adjoining phage therapies are discussed.

Keywords: antibiotic resistance; bacteriophage; phage therapy; sustainable agriculture; zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Ramankutty N., Mehrabi Z., Waha K., Jarvis L., Kremen C., Herreo M., Rieseberg L.H. Trends in global agriculturl land use: Implications for environmental health and food safety. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018;69 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040256. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Muller A., Schader C., El-Hage Scialabba N., Bruggemann J., Isensee A., Erb K.H., Smith P., Klocke P., Leiber F., Stolze M., et al. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1290. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01410-w. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pingali P.L. Green revolution: Impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:12302–12308. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912953109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moore P., Evenson A., Luckey T., McCoy E., Elvehjem C., Hart E. Studies with the chick streptomycin in nutritional streptothricin, and use of sulfasuxidine. J. Biol. Chem. 1946;165:437–441. - PubMed
    1. Cheng G., Hao H., Xie S., Wang X., Dai M., Huang L., Yuan Z. Antibiotic alternatives: The substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry? Front. Microbiol. 2014;5:217. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources