Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;5(6):855-860.
doi: 10.1002/celc.201800047. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

Conserved Histidine Adjacent to the Proximal Cluster Tunes the Anaerobic Reductive Activation of Escherichia coli Membrane-Bound [NiFe] Hydrogenase-1

Affiliations

Conserved Histidine Adjacent to the Proximal Cluster Tunes the Anaerobic Reductive Activation of Escherichia coli Membrane-Bound [NiFe] Hydrogenase-1

Lindsey A Flanagan et al. ChemElectroChem. 2018 Mar.

Abstract

[NiFe] hydrogenases are electrocatalysts that oxidize H2 at a rapid rate without the need for precious metals. All membrane-bound [NiFe] hydrogenases (MBH) possess a histidine residue that points to the electron-transfer iron sulfur cluster closest ("proximal") to the [NiFe] H2-binding active site. Replacement of this amino acid with alanine induces O2 sensitivity, and this has been attributed to the role of the histidine in enabling the reversible O2-induced over-oxidation of the [Fe4S3Cys2] proximal cluster possessed by all O2-tolerant MBH. We have created an Escherichia coli Hyd-1 His-to-Ala variant and report O2-free electrochemical measurements at high potential that indicate the histidine-mediated [Fe4S3Cys2] cluster-opening/closing mechanism also underpins anaerobic reactivation. We validate these experiments by comparing them to the impact of an analogous His-to-Ala replacement in Escherichia coli Hyd-2, a [NiFe]-MBH that contains a [Fe4S4] center.

Keywords: bioinorganic chemistry; electrochemistry; electron transfer; hydrogen; metalloenzymes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Structural similarities and differences between O2‐tolerant MBH and O2‐sensitive [NiFe] hydrogenases. i) Cartoon of the heterodimeric minimal functional unit. ii) The difference between the proximal iron sulfur cluster (FeSproximal) structure of O2‐sensitive enzymes which contain an [Fe4S4] center, and the proximal [Fe4S3Cys2] center of O2‐tolerant MBH, which can reversibly interconvert between a “closed”, +3, reduced state and an “open”, +5, “over‐oxidized” state. The relative position of His amino acids to these centers is highlighted, with E. coli Hyd‐2 numbering used in the O2‐sensitive structure which is derived from PDB 3MYR[7], and E. coli Hyd‐1 numbering used in the O2‐tolerant structures which are derived from PDB 3RGW4 for the +5 state and PDB 4IUC5 for the +3 state. Colors: gray ribbon, small subunit; green ribbon, large subunit; yellow spheres and sticks, sulfur; orange spheres, iron; light blue, carbon; dark blue, nitrogen; red, oxygen. iii) Dance's proposed6 proton‐transfer pathway from Glu‐73 to S3 that is mediated by His‐229, which is sensitive to the active site geometry via its H‐bond to Thr‐80. Top structure based on E. coli Hyd‐1 PDB3UQY, and bottom on E. coli Hyd‐1 3USC. Green labels indicate large subunit (HyaB) residues, gray labels indicate small subunit (HyaA) residues and the location of the OH group observed by Frielingsdorf et al.5 is indicated. Green spheres are used to indicate nickel, all other color Scheme details are as in (ii). iv) Sequence alignments comparing the ligation of the proximal cluster of O2‐tolerant MBH and O2‐sensitive [NiFe] hydrogenase. E. coli Hyd‐1 numbering is used.
Scheme 1
Scheme 1
How the catalytically active Ni2+ form of the active site, the Ni‐Sia state, can be reversibly inactivated to form the Ni3+‐containing Ni‐B state.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Catalytic voltammograms (5 mV s−1) measured under an atmosphere of 3 % H2, 97 % N2 for native Hyd‐1 (top left), Hyd1‐H229A variant (bottom left), native Hyd‐2 (top right), and Hyd2‐H214A variant (bottom right). Within each panel, the same film of enzyme was used for all the pH points. Four scans were measured at each pH and the fourth cycle is shown, with the current traces normalized to the maximum H2 oxidation current.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Chronoamperometric traces showing the O2 tolerance of native Hyd‐2 (black) and the Hyd2‐H214A variant (red) at pH 6.0 (top), as well as native Hyd‐1 (bottom left) and the Hyd1‐H229A variant (bottom right) at pH 4.5, 6.0 and 7.6, as indicated. For the Hyd‐2 experiments, the H2 oxidation activity was monitored at a constant potential of −0.135 V vs SHE; for the Hyd‐1 experiments, the potentials were +0.175 V vs SHE (pH 4.5), +0.085 V vs SHE (pH 6.0) or −0.05 V vs SHE (pH 7.6). Current traces were corrected for film loss and normalized to the H2 oxidation current immediately before the addition of O2.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Potential step experiment to measure activation and inactivation rates of native Hyd‐1 and variant H1‐H229A at pH 6.0, 10 % H2. The potential‐time steps applied in the chronoamperometry experiment (top). Resulting chronoamperometric traces for native Hyd‐1 (middle) and variant Hyd1‐H229A (bottom). Other experimental conditions: 37 °C, electrode rotation rate 4,000 rpm, N2 carrier gas and total gas flow rate 1,000 scc min−1.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Inactivation, k I, and activation, k A, rate constant values for native Hyd‐1 and variant Hyd1‐H229A, as extracted from analysis of pH 6.0, 10 % H2 experiments such as those shown in Figure S6. Data points show the average value calculated from three repeat experiments, and error bars show the standard error.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Parkin A., in The Metal-Driven Biogeochemistry of Gaseous Compounds in the Environment (Eds.: P. M. H. Kroneck, M. E. S. Torres), Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2014, pp. 99–124.
    1. None
    1. Flanagan L. A., Parkin A., Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2016, 44, 315–328; - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adamson H., Robinson M., Wright J. J., Flanagan L. A., Walton J., Elton D., Gavaghan D. J., Bond A. M., Roessler M. M., Parkin A., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 10677–10686. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lukey M. J., Parkin A., Roessler M. M., Murphy B. J., Harmer J., Palmer T., Sargent F., Armstrong F. A., J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 3928–3938. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources