Open Relationships, Nonconsensual Nonmonogamy, and Monogamy Among U.S. Adults: Findings from the 2012 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior
- PMID: 29696552
- PMCID: PMC5958351
- DOI: 10.1007/s10508-018-1178-7
Open Relationships, Nonconsensual Nonmonogamy, and Monogamy Among U.S. Adults: Findings from the 2012 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior
Abstract
People in open and other consensually nonmonogamous partnerships have been historically underserved by researchers and providers. Many studies group such partnerships together with nonconsensual nonmonogamy (NCNM) under the banner of "concurrent sexual partnerships." Discrimination from service providers poses a substantial barrier to care. Responding to such concerns, this investigation explored sociodemographic correlates with open relationships and associations between relationship structure and sexual risk, HIV/STI testing, and relationship satisfaction in a nationally representative probability sample. Data were drawn from the 2012 National Survey of Sexual Health and Behavior (n = 2270). We used multinomial logistic regression to identify correlates with relationship structure, and linear and logistic regression to investigate associations between relationship structure and testing, condom use, and relationship satisfaction. Eighty-nine percent of participants reported monogamy, 4% reported open relationships, and 8% reported NCNM. Males, gay/lesbian individuals, bisexual individuals, and those who identified as "Other, Non-Hispanic" were more likely to report open relationships. Bisexual individuals and Black, Non-Hispanic participants were more likely to report NCNM; older participants were less likely to do so. Participants in open relationships reported more frequent condom use for anal intercourse and lower relationship satisfaction than monogamous participants. NCNM participants reported more HIV testing and lower satisfaction. Identities, experiences, and behaviors within open and other consensually nonmonogamous populations should be regarded as unique and diverse, rather than conflated with those common to other relationship structures. There is a need for greater awareness of diverse relationship structures among researchers and providers, and incorporation of related content into educational programming.
Keywords: Consensual nonmonogamy; HIV and STI testing; Open relationships; Relationship structure; Sexual behaviors; Sexual minorities.
Similar articles
-
A Comparison of Sexual Health History and Practices among Monogamous and Consensually Nonmonogamous Sexual Partners.J Sex Med. 2015 Oct;12(10):2022-8. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12987. Epub 2015 Sep 22. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 26395880
-
Condom use and HIV risk behaviors among U.S. adults: data from a national survey.Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jan-Feb;31(1):24-8. Fam Plann Perspect. 1999. PMID: 10029929
-
Perceptions of monogamy, nonconsensual nonmonogamy and consensual nonmonogamy at the intersections of race and gender.Cult Health Sex. 2020 Sep 30:1-16. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2020.1817561. Online ahead of print. Cult Health Sex. 2020. PMID: 32996411
-
Monogamy and Nonmonogamy: Evolutionary Considerations and Treatment Challenges.Sex Med Rev. 2016 Oct;4(4):343-352. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2016.05.005. Epub 2016 Jun 11. Sex Med Rev. 2016. PMID: 27872028 Review.
-
Providing Online-Based Sexual Health Outreach to Gay, Bisexual, and Queer Men in Ontario, Canada: Qualitative Interviews with Multisectoral Frontline Service Providers and Managers.AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Jul;32(7):282-287. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0027. Epub 2018 Jun 13. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018. PMID: 29897787 Review.
Cited by
-
Negative Associations between Minority Stressors and Self-Reported Health Status among Sexual Minority Adults Living in Colombia.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 7;12(4):429. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12040429. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38391805 Free PMC article.
-
What Drives the Dehumanization of Consensual Non-Monogamous Partners?Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1587-1597. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01895-5. Epub 2021 May 4. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 33948766
-
"What Are You Looking For?" Investigating the Association Between Dating App Use and Sexual Risk Behaviors.Sex Med. 2021 Aug;9(4):100405. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100405. Epub 2021 Jul 16. Sex Med. 2021. PMID: 34280593 Free PMC article.
-
Personality Predictors of Prejudicial Attitudes, Willingness to Engage, and Actual Engagement in Consensual Non-Monogamy.Arch Sex Behav. 2022 Nov;51(8):3947-3961. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02393-6. Epub 2022 Aug 29. Arch Sex Behav. 2022. PMID: 36036872
-
LGBQ-affirming clinical recommendations for compulsive sexual behavior disorder.J Behav Addict. 2024 Apr 9;13(2):413-428. doi: 10.1556/2006.2024.00012. Print 2024 Jun 26. J Behav Addict. 2024. PMID: 38592797 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Adimora AA, Schoenbach VJ, Bonas DM, Martinson FEA, Donaldson KH, Stancil TR. Concurrent sexual partnerships among women in the United States. Epidemiology. 2002;13(3):320–327. - PubMed
-
- Barker M, Langdridge D. What ever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory. Sexualities. 2010;13(6):748–772.
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2015 Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. 2015 Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/std/tg2015/default.htm.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical