Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 1;33(6):707-714.
doi: 10.1093/heapol/czy041.

Implementation and clinical effectiveness of a community-based non-communicable disease treatment programme in rural Mexico: a difference-in-differences analysis

Affiliations

Implementation and clinical effectiveness of a community-based non-communicable disease treatment programme in rural Mexico: a difference-in-differences analysis

Kevin Duan et al. Health Policy Plan. .

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) account for the five largest contributors to burden of disease in Mexico, with diabetes representing the greatest contributor. However, evidence supporting chronic disease programmes in Mexico is limited, especially in rural communities. Compañeros En Salud (CES) partnered with the Secretariat of Health of Chiapas, Mexico to implement a novel community-based NCD treatment programme. We describe the implementation of this programme and conducted a population-based, retrospective analysis, using a difference-in-differences regression approach to estimate the impact of the programme. Specifically, we examined changes in diabetes and hypertension control rates between 2014 and 2016, comparing CES intervention clinics (n = 9) to care-as-usual at non-CES clinics (n = 806), adjusting for differences in facility-level characteristics. In 2014, the percent of diabetes patients with this condition under control was 36.9% at non-CES facilities, compared with 41.3% at CES facilities (P > 0.05). For hypertension patients, these figures were 45.2% at non-CES facilities compared with 56.2% at CES facilities (P = 0.02). From 2014 to 2016, the percent of patients with diabetes under control declined by 9.2% at non-CES facilities, while improving by 11.3% at non-CES facilities where the Compañeros En Salud Programa de Enfermedades Crónicas intervention was implemented (P < 0.001). Among hypertension patients, those with the condition under control increased by 21.5% at non-CES facilities between 2014 and 2016, compared with 16.2% at CES facilities (P > 0.05). Introduction of the CES model of NCD care was associated with significantly greater improvements in diabetes management between 2014 and 2016, compared with care-as-usual. Hypertension control measures were already greater at CES facilities in 2014, a difference that was maintained through 2016. These findings highlight the successful implementation of a framework for providing NCD care in rural Mexico, where a rapidly increasing NCD disease burden exists.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CESPEC approach of NCD care
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Diabetes and hypertension management, CES and non-CES facilities. CES stands for Compañeros En Salud facilities. Percent managed represents the average percentage of patients, across CES or non-CES facilities for a given year, whose condition has been stabilized and is under control, based on national guidelines. These figures, derived from statistical models, have been adjusted for facility-level differences in patient characteristics

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Balcazar H, Perez-Lizaur AB, Izeta EE. et al. 2016. Community health workers-promotores de salud in mexico: history and potential for building effective community actions. Journal of Ambulatory Care Management 39: 12–22. - PubMed
    1. Bhutta ZA, Lassi ZS, Pariyo G. et al. 2010. Global Experience of Community Health Workers for Delivery of Health Related Millennium Development Goals: A Systematic Review, Country Case Studies, and Recommendations for Integration into National Health Systems Geneva: World Health Organization: http://www.who.int/workforcealliance/knowledge/resources/chwreport/en/, accessed 5 July 2017.
    1. Budd L. 2007. Post‐bureaucracy and reanimating public governance: a discourse and practice of continuity? International Journal of Public Sector Management 20: 531–47.
    1. Córdova-Villalobos JA, Barriguete-Meléndez JA, Lara-Esqueda A. et al. 2008. Chronic non-communicable diseases in Mexico: epidemiologic synopsis and integral prevention. Salud Publica De Mexico 50: 419–27. - PubMed
    1. Dolea C. (2010) Increasing Access to Health Workers in Remote and Rural Areas through Improved Retention: Global Policy Recommendations. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization. - PubMed