Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun;11(3):779-785.
doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 24.

High Serum Level of Soluble Programmed Death Ligand 1 is Associated With a Poor Prognosis in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Affiliations

High Serum Level of Soluble Programmed Death Ligand 1 is Associated With a Poor Prognosis in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Xiaofang Guo et al. Transl Oncol. 2018 Jun.

Abstract

Blockade of the programmed cell death 1-programmed cell death ligand 1 pathway is a new and promising therapeutic approach in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). To our knowledge, the impact of soluble programmed cell death ligand 1 (sPD-L1) serum levels on HL patient prognosis has not yet been investigated. In this study, the prognostic value of sPD-L1 was assessed in patients with HL. We measured serum sPD-L1 levels and identified their prognostic value in 108 newly diagnosed HL patients using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We found higher serum sPD-L1 concentrations in HL patients than in healthy controls. The best sPD-L1 cutoff value for predicting disease progression risk was 25.1674 ng/ml. The 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the high-sPD-L1 and low-sPD-L1 groups were 78.8% and 93.3%, respectively. Multivariate survival analysis showed that advanced stage and higher sPD-L1 levels (>25.1674 ng/ml) were independent prognostic factors for shorter PFS. In addition, higher sPD-L1 levels were positively correlated with advanced stage and negatively correlated with peripheral blood monocyte number. The serum sPD-L1 level is an independent prognostic factor for PFS in HL patients and may allow identification of a subgroup of patients who require more intensive therapy and who may benefit from anti-PD-1 agents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Serum sPD-L1 levels in patients with HL and in healthy controls.
Figure 2
Figure 2
ROC curve analysis for the optimal cutoff point of serum sPD-L1 concentration.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for all patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma. A-1and A-2: PFS and OS of HL patients in low- or high-sPD-L1 groups. B-1 and B-2: PFS and OS of HL patients with limited and advanced stages of disease. C-1 and C2: PFS and OS of HL patients with different treatment responses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ansell SM. Hodgkin lymphoma: diagnosis and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015;90:1574–1583. - PubMed
    1. Villasboas JC, Ansell SM. Recent advances in the management of Hodgkin lymphoma. F1000Res. 2016;5:768–776. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baues C, Semrau R, Gaipl US, Brockelmann PJ, Rosenbrock J, Engert A, Marnitz S. Checkpoint inhibitors and radiation treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma : New study concepts of the German Hodgkin Study Group. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193:95–99. - PubMed
    1. Viviani S, Zinzani PL, Rambaldi A, Brusamolino E, Levis A, Bonfante V, Vitolo U, Pulsoni A, Liberati AM, Specchia G. ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin's lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:203–212. - PubMed
    1. Fedele R, Martino M, Recchia AG, Irrera G, Gentile M, Morabito F. Clinical options in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma: An updated review. J Immunol Res. 2015;2015 (1-8) - PMC - PubMed