Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2011 Mar 17;10(2):81-87.
doi: 10.1007/s12522-011-0080-y. eCollection 2011 Jun.

Anticancer chemotherapeutic agents and testicular dysfunction

Affiliations
Review

Anticancer chemotherapeutic agents and testicular dysfunction

Kohei Yamaguchi et al. Reprod Med Biol. .

Abstract

The improvement of the survival rates of various cancer patients has resulted in increased focus on the long-term complications of treatment. Most anticancer chemotherapeutic agents are gonadotoxic, and sterility is therefore one of the most common complications for cancer survivors. The degree of gonadal dysfunction induced by anticancer chemotherapeutic agents seems to be drug specific and dose related. Following the development of new chemotherapeutic agents that have high benefit-to-risk ratios, sufficient sperm can be acquired by collection of ejaculated semen after the treatment in relatively many cases, and assisted reproductive techniques enable conceptions with even severe spermatogenesis dysfunction. However, anticancer chemotherapeutic agents have consistently exhibited the potential to induce permanent azoospermia. Cryopreservation of semen, which is currently the only proven successful option for future fertility preservation in male cancer patients, should certainly be recommended before cancer therapy. However, to date, no established effective methods have shown the capability to protect gonadal function from anticancer treatment in prepubertal cancer patients.

Keywords: Chemotherapy; Gonadal dysfunction; Hematological malignancy; Spermatogenesis; Testicular cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Mead GM, Stenning SP. The International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a new prognostic factor‐based staging classification for metastatic germ cell tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), 1997, 9, 207–209 - PubMed
    1. Sieber M, Rueffer U, Josting A, Diehl V. Treatment of Hodgkin's disease: current strategies of the German Hodgkin's Lymphoma Study Group. Ann Oncol, 1999, 10, 23–29 10.1023/A:1008324001137 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Raemaekers J, Kluin‐Nelemans H, Teodorovic I, Meerwaldt C, Noordijk E, Thomas J, Glabbeke M, Henry‐Amar M, Carde P The Achievements of the EORTC Lymphoma Group . European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2002, 38, S107–S113 10.1016/S0959‐8049(01)00446‐4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen YT, Zheng T, Chou MC, Boyle P, Holford TR. The increase of Hodgkin's disease incidence among young adults. Experience in Connecticut, 1935–1992. Cancer, 1997, 79, 2209–2218 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0142(19970601)79:11<2209::AID‐CNCR20>3.0.CO;2‐Z - DOI - PubMed
    1. DeSantis M, Albrecht W, Höltl W, Pont J. Impact of cytotoxic treatment on long‐term fertility in patients with germ‐cell cancer. Int J Cancer, 1999, 83, 864–865 10.1002/(SICI)1097‐0215(19991210)83:6<864::AID‐IJC33>3.0.CO;2‐E - DOI - PubMed