Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Jul 28;4(3):197-201.
doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2005.00105.x. eCollection 2005 Sep.

Elective single embryo transfer: Comparison of blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer

Affiliations

Elective single embryo transfer: Comparison of blastocyst and cleavage-stage embryo transfer

Toshihiro Kawamura et al. Reprod Med Biol. .

Abstract

Objective: Blastocysts are reportedly suitable for preventing multiple pregnancies as a result of the high implantation rate per embryo. The present study compared clinical results for elective single embryo transfer (ET) between blastocysts and cleavage-stage embryos in order to ascertain the usefulness of blastocyst culturing in single ET. Methods: Between January 2002 and December 2004, conventional in vitro fertilization ET and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection was carried out for single ET in 86 cycles, to prevent multiple pregnancies (for medical reasons or because of patient wishes). Results: Among the 80 cycles in which a fresh embryo was transferred, pregnancy/implantation rates per ET were 35.3% for day 2/3 ET and 50.0% for day 5 ET, and pregnancy/implantation rates per oocyte retrieval were 35.3% for day 2/3 ET and 44.2% for day 5 ET. Ongoing pregnancy/delivery rates per oocyte retrieval were 32.4% for day 2/3 ET and 38.5% for day 5 ET. Monozygotic twinning occurred in one case of day 5 ET. Conclusions: Pregnancy rates per single ET tended to be higher for day 5 ET than for day 2/3 ET. However, no marked differences were identified in ongoing pregnancy/delivery rates per oocyte retrieval between groups. (Reprod Med Biol 2005; 4: 197-201).

Keywords: blastocyst transfer; cleavage‐stage embryo transfer; single embryo transfer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Fanchin R, Ayoubi JM, Righini C, Olivennes F, Schonauer LM, Frydman R. Uterine contractility decreases at the time of blastocyst transfers. Hum Reprod 2001; 16: 1115–1119. - PubMed
    1. Gardner DK, Lane M. Blastocyst transfer. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2003; 46: 231–238. - PubMed
    1. Behr B, Fisch JD, Racowsky C, Miller K, Pool TB, Milki AA. Blastocyst‐ET and monozygotic twinning. J Assist Reprod Genet 2000 July; 17: 349–351. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Milki AA, Jun SH, Hinckley MD, Behr B, Giudice LC, Westphal LM. Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage‐stage transfer. Fertil Steril 2003; 79: 503–506. - PubMed
    1. Gardner DK, Lane M. Culture and selection of viable blastocysts: a feasible proposition for human IVF? Hum Reprod Update 1997; 3: 367–382. - PubMed