Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;33(1):30-38.
doi: 10.1177/0890117118772510. Epub 2018 Apr 26.

Availability and Use of Workplace Supports for Health Promotion Among Employees of Small and Large Businesses

Ann Marie Dale  1   2 , Chris Enke  3 , Skye Buckner-Petty  1 , James Aaron Hipp  4 , Christine Marx  5 , Jaime Strickland  1 , Bradley Evanoff  1
Affiliations

Availability and Use of Workplace Supports for Health Promotion Among Employees of Small and Large Businesses

Ann Marie Dale et al. Am J Health Promot. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the availability and utilization of workplace health supports by employees of small and large-sized employers.

Design: Cross-sectional, telephone-based interviews collected on 16 workplace health supports for physical activity and diet.

Setting: Participants selected by random-digit-dialing from 4 metropolitan areas of Missouri employees from 2012 to 2013.

Participants: Two thousand fifteen working adults.

Methods: We explored the availability and use of supports by employer size (<100 employees vs ≥100 employees), accounting for industry and personal factors.

Analysis: We examined distributions and Poisson regression models of availability for supports by employer size and by industry and use of supports by employer size and personal factors.

Results: One-fifth of the 1796 employees were employed by small-sized employers. Large employers offered more supports than small (mean: 6 vs 3), but a higher proportion of employees of small-sized employers used supports when available (59% vs 47%). The differences in offered supports between industries were not due to size alone. In regard to the determinants of participation, the personal factors of gender, age, weight, and income were associated with participation in 10 of the supports. Employer size was also associated with participation in 10 supports. No associations were found between personal factors or workplace size and participation for 3 supports.

Conclusion: A higher proportion of employees working for smaller businesses use available supports than employees of larger businesses. Supports offered by employers should target the needs and interests of the workforce, particularly for the higher risk low-income employees.

Keywords: health behaviors; health disparities; small businesses; supportive environments; workplace.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Statement:

The Authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Availability and use of workplace supports based on employer size of the overall company and work location, n=1,796: Supports at Home and Work for Maintaining Energy Balance (SHOW–ME) study, Missouri, USA, 2012–2013
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Linnan LA, Sorensen G, Colditz G, Klar DN, Emmons KM. Using theory to understand the multiple determinants of low participation in worksite health promotion programs. Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education. 2001;28(5):591–607. - PubMed
    1. Laing SS, Hannon PA, Talburt A, Kimpe S, Williams B, Harris JR. Increasing evidence-based workplace health promotion best practices in small and low-wage companies, Mason County, Washington, 2009. Prev Chronic Dis. 2012;9:E83. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Katz DL, O’Connell M, Yeh MC, et al. Public health strategies for preventing and controlling overweight and obesity in school and worksite settings: a report on recommendations of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(Rr-10):1–12. - PubMed
    1. Mattke S, Liu H, Caloyeras J, et al. Workplace Wellness Programs Study: Final Report. Rand health quarterly. 2013;3(2):7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Small Business Association. Workplace wellness programs in small business: Impacting the bottom line. 2012. http://www.nsba.biz/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/wellness-survey-v3.pdf.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources