Advances in osteobiologic materials for bone substitutes
- PMID: 29701908
- DOI: 10.1002/term.2677
Advances in osteobiologic materials for bone substitutes
Abstract
A significant challenge in the current orthopedics is the development of suitable osteobiologic materials that can replace the conventional allografts, autografts, and xenografts and thereby serve as implant materials as bone substitutes for bone repair or remodelling. The complex biology behind the nanostructure and microstructure of bones and their repair mechanisms, which involve various types of chemical and biomechanical signalling amongst different cells, has set strong requirements for biomaterials to be used in bone tissue engineering. This review presents an overview of various types of osteobiologic materials to facilitate the formation of the functional bone tissue and healing of the bone, covering metallic, ceramic, polymeric, and cell-based graft substitutes, as well as some biomolecular strategies including stem cells, extracellular matrices, growth factors, and gene therapies. Advantages and disadvantages of each type, particularly from the perspective of osteoinductive and osteoconductive capabilities, are discussed. Although the numerous challenges of bone regeneration in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine are yet to be entirely addressed, further advancements in osteobiologic materials will pave the way towards engineering fully functional bone replacement grafts.
Keywords: biology of bone; bone graft substitutes; osteobiologics; tissue engineering.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Osteoinductive biomaterials--properties and relevance in bone repair.J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007 Jan-Feb;1(1):25-32. doi: 10.1002/term.5. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2007. PMID: 18038389 Review.
-
Osteobiologics.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007 Apr;36(4 Suppl):8-11. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2007. PMID: 17547352 Review.
-
Osteobiologics.Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2004;62(1-2):13-7. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 2004. PMID: 15517852 Review.
-
Osteoinductive potential of 4 commonly employed bone grafts.Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Nov;20(8):2259-2265. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1724-4. Epub 2016 Jan 27. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. PMID: 26814714
-
Current state of fabrication technologies and materials for bone tissue engineering.Acta Biomater. 2018 Oct 15;80:1-30. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.09.031. Epub 2018 Sep 22. Acta Biomater. 2018. PMID: 30248515 Review.
Cited by
-
Honeycomb blocks composed of carbonate apatite, β-tricalcium phosphate, and hydroxyapatite for bone regeneration: effects of composition on biological responses.Mater Today Bio. 2019 Sep 24;4:100031. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2019.100031. eCollection 2019 Sep. Mater Today Bio. 2019. PMID: 32159156 Free PMC article.
-
Bone induction and defect repair by true bone ceramics incorporated with rhBMP-2 and Sr.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021 Aug 24;32(9):107. doi: 10.1007/s10856-021-06587-7. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021. PMID: 34427778 Free PMC article.
-
Development of Graphene-Based Materials in Bone Tissue Engineaering.Glob Chall. 2021 Dec 2;6(2):2100107. doi: 10.1002/gch2.202100107. eCollection 2022 Feb. Glob Chall. 2021. PMID: 35140982 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Synthetic osteobiologics in spine surgery: a review.Turk J Med Sci. 2024 Oct 25;55(1):43-51. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5941. eCollection 2025. Turk J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 40104322 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Native Bovine Hydroxyapatite Powder, Demineralised Bone Matrix Powder, and Purified Bone Collagen Membranes Are Efficient in Repair of Critical-Sized Rat Calvarial Defects.Materials (Basel). 2020 Jul 31;13(15):3393. doi: 10.3390/ma13153393. Materials (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32751921 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources