Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 20;36(18):1788-1797.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6757. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

Clearance of Somatic Mutations at Remission and the Risk of Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Affiliations

Clearance of Somatic Mutations at Remission and the Risk of Relapse in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Kiyomi Morita et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose The aim of the current study was to determine whether the degree of mutation clearance at remission predicts the risk of relapse in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Patients and Methods One hundred thirty-one previously untreated patients with AML who received intensive induction chemotherapy and attained morphologic complete remission (CR) at day 30 were studied. Pretreatment and CR bone marrow were analyzed using targeted capture DNA sequencing. We analyzed the association between mutation clearance (MC) on the basis of variant allele frequency (VAF) at CR (MC2.5: if the VAF of residual mutations was < 2.5%; MC1.0: if the VAF was < 1%; and complete MC [CMC]: if no detectable residual mutations) and event-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). Results MC1.0 and CMC were associated with significantly better OS (2-year OS: 75% v 61% in MC1.0 v non-MC1.0; P = .0465; 2-year OS: 77% v 60% in CMC v non-CMC; P = .0303) and lower CIR (2-year CIR: 26% v 46% in MC1.0 v non-MC 1.0; P = .0349; 2 year-CIR: 24% v 46% in CMC v non-CMC; P = .03), whereas there was no significant difference in any of the above outcomes by MC2.5. Multivariable analysis adjusting for age, cytogenetic risk, allogeneic stem-cell transplantation, and flow cytometry-based minimal residual disease revealed that patients with CMC had significantly better event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; P = .0083), OS (HR, 0.47; P = .04), and CIR (HR, 0.27; P < .001) than did patients without CMC. These prognostic associations were stronger when preleukemic mutations, such as DNMT3A, TET2, and ASXL1, were removed from the analysis. Conclusion Clearance of somatic mutation at CR, particularly in nonpreleukemic genes, was associated with significantly better survival and less risk of relapse. Somatic mutations in nonpreleukemic genes may function as a molecular minimal residual disease marker in AML.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01025154 NCT01289457 NCT02115295.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram for the for the study cohort. CIA, idarubicin and cytarabine with clofarabine; CLIA, idarubicin and cytarabine with cladribine; CMC, complete mutation clearance; CR, complete remission; FIA, idarubicin and cytarabine with fludarabine; MC, mutation clearance; MC1.0, mutation clearance with residual variant allele frequency < 1%; MC2.5, mutation clearance with residual variant allele frequency < 2.5%.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
Frequency of somatic mutations detected in the pretreatment (Pre) and complete remission (CR) samples.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Prognostic impact of mutation clearance at day 30 complete remission marrow in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Event-free survival (EFS) for patients who achieved complete remission according to three levels of residual somatic mutation. (A) MC2.5 (mutation clearance with residual variant allele frequency [VAF] < 2.5%). (B) MC1.0 (mutation clearance with residual VAF < 1%). (C) complete mutation clearance (CMC). (D-F) Overall survival (OS) according to (D) MC2.5, (E) MC1.0, and (F) CMC. (G-I) Cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) according to (G) MC2.5, (H) MC1.0, and (I) CMC. Median follow-up was 28.5 months (95% CI, 24.0 to 35.2 months), 28.5 months (95% CI, 24.0 to 34.6 months), and 28.3 months (95% CI, 23.3 to 35.2 months) for those who achieved MC2.5, MC1.0, and CMC, respectively. P values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Bonferroni method considering nine test times.
Fig 4.
Fig 4.
Prognostic impact of stem cell transplantation (SCT) at first complete remission (CR1). (A) Overall survival (OS) for patients who did not achieve complete mutation clearance (CMC) at remission according to SCT status. (B) OS for patients who achieved CMC at remission according to SCT status.

References

    1. Mandelli F, Vignetti M, Suciu S, et al. : Daunorubicin versus mitoxantrone versus idarubicin as induction and consolidation chemotherapy for adults with acute myeloid leukemia: The EORTC and GIMEMA Groups Study AML-10. J Clin Oncol 27:5397-5403, 2009 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walter RB, Othus M, Burnett AK, et al. : Resistance prediction in AML: Analysis of 4601 patients from MRC/NCRI, HOVON/SAKK, SWOG and MD Anderson Cancer Center. Leukemia 29:312-320, 2015 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Döhner H, Estey E, Grimwade D, et al. : Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2017 ELN recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood 129:424-447, 2017 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Medeiros BC, Othus M, Fang M, et al. : Prognostic impact of monosomal karyotype in young adult and elderly acute myeloid leukemia: The Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) experience. Blood 116:2224-2228, 2010 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rücker FG, Schlenk RF, Bullinger L, et al. : TP53 alterations in acute myeloid leukemia with complex karyotype correlate with specific copy number alterations, monosomal karyotype, and dismal outcome. Blood 119:2114-2121, 2012 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data