Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 27;8(5):67.
doi: 10.3390/ani8050067.

Anthropogenic Food Subsidy to a Commensal Carnivore: The Value and Supply of Human Faeces in the Diet of Free-Ranging Dogs

Affiliations

Anthropogenic Food Subsidy to a Commensal Carnivore: The Value and Supply of Human Faeces in the Diet of Free-Ranging Dogs

James R A Butler et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

As the global population of free-ranging domestic dogs grows, there is increasing concern about impacts on human health and wildlife conservation. Effective management of dog populations requires reliable information on their diet, feeding behavior, and social ecology. Free-ranging dogs are reliant on humans, but anthropogenic food subsidies, particularly human faeces (i.e., coprophagy) have not previously been fully quantified. In this study we assess the contributions of different food types to the diet, and their influences on the social behaviour of free-ranging dogs in communal lands of rural Zimbabwe, with a focus on coprophagy. Free-ranging dog diets, body condition, and sociology were studied amongst 72 dogs over 18 months using scat analysis and direct observations. Human faeces constituted the fourth most common item in scats (56% occurrence) and contributed 21% by mass to the observed diet. Human faeces represented a valuable resource because relative to other food items it was consistently available, and of higher nutritional value than ‘sadza’ (maize porridge, the human staple and primary human-derived food), yielding 18.7% crude protein and 18.7 KJ/kg gross energy, compared to 8.3% and 18.5 KJ/kg for sadza, respectively. Human faeces had protein and energy values equivalent to mammal remains, another important food item. Dog condition was generally good, with 64% of adult females and 74% of adult males in the highest two body condition scores (on a five point scale), suggesting a plentiful and high quality food supply. Dogs largely fed alone, perhaps as a consequence of the small, inert, and spatially dispersed items that comprise their diet, and its abundance. We discuss the relationships between sanitation, human development, the supply of human faeces, female dog fertility, and population control.

Keywords: Dog Development Index; canine nutrition; coprophagy; rabies; scavenging; social ecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The location of the Gokwe Communal Land study area and the Sengwa Wildlife Research Area (SWRA) in northwestern Zimbabwe.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A typical homestead and livelihood activity in the study area (photo: James Butler).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Monthly (January 1995–June 1996) percentage frequency of occurrence in dog scats of (a) sadza and human faeces, and (b) mammalian remains, vegetables and fruit, and insects, through dry and wet seasons. Numbers in brackets indicate the monthly sample size of scats analysed.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A free-ranging dog uncovering and eating human faeces buried in a field. This animal represents condition score 4 (photo: James Butler).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Relative frequency of monthly (July 1995–June 1996) and overall condition scores for (a) adult female and (b) adult male dogs, through dry and wet seasons. Numbers in brackets indicate the monthly or total sample sizes of records.
Figure 6
Figure 6
The duration of 689 observed dog meals, and the food items being fed on at each meal.
Figure 7
Figure 7
The numbers of other dogs feeding with the focal animal at each of the 689 meals.

References

    1. Hughes J., Macdonald D.W. A review of the interactions between free-roaming domestic dogs and wildlife. Biol. Conserv. 2013;157:341–351. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.005. - DOI
    1. Butler J.R.A., Linnell J.D.C., Morrant D., Athreya V., Lescureux N., McKeown A. Dog eat dog, cat eat dog: Social-ecological dimensions of dog predation by wild carnivores. In: Gompper M.E., editor. Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2014. pp. 117–143.
    1. WHO . World Health Organization Expert Consultation on Rabies. Volume 931. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2005. pp. 1–88. (World Health Organization Technical Report Series). - PubMed
    1. Smout F.A., Skerratt L.F., Butler J.R.A., Johnson C.N., Congdon B.C., Thompson R.C.A. The hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicum: An emerging public health risk in Australian tropical rainforests and Indigenous communities. One Health. 2017;3:66–69. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2017.04.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gompper M.E. The dog-human-wildlife interface: Assessing the scope of the problem. In: Gompper M.E., editor. Free-Ranging Dogs and Wildlife Conservation. Oxford University Press; Oxford, UK: 2014. pp. 9–54.

LinkOut - more resources