Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2018 May;5(5):e190-e200.
doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30039-5.

CHOP versus GEM-P in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (CHEMO-T): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

CHOP versus GEM-P in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma (CHEMO-T): a phase 2, multicentre, randomised, open-label trial

Mary Gleeson et al. Lancet Haematol. 2018 May.

Abstract

Background: Outcomes with CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone) or CHOP-like chemotherapy in peripheral T-cell lymphoma are poor. We investigated whether the regimen of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) was superior to CHOP as front-line therapy in previously untreated patients.

Methods: We did a phase 2, parallel-group, multicentre, open-label randomised trial in 47 hospitals: 46 in the UK and one in Australia. Participants were patients aged 18 years and older with bulky (tumour mass diameter >10 cm) stage I to stage IV disease (WHO performance status 0-3), previously untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell lymphoma, enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma, or hepatosplenic γδ T-cell lymphoma. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) stratified by subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphoma and international prognostic index to either CHOP (intravenous cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 [maximum 2 mg] on day 1, and oral prednisolone 100 mg on days 1-5) every 21 days for six cycles; or GEM-P (intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15, cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 15, and oral or intravenous methylprednisolone 1000 mg on days 1-5) every 28 days for four cycles. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a CT-based complete response or unconfirmed complete response on completion of study chemotherapy, to detect a 20% superiority of GEM-P compared with CHOP, assessed in all patients who received at least one cycle of treatment and had an end-of-treatment CT scan or reported clinical progression as the reason for stopping trial treatment. Safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study medication. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01719835) and the European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT 2011-004146-18).

Findings: Between June 18, 2012, and Nov 16, 2016, we randomly assigned 87 patients to treatment, 43 to CHOP and 44 to GEM-P. A planned unmasked review of efficacy data by the independent data monitoring committee in November, 2016, showed that the number of patients with a confirmed or unconfirmed complete response with GEM-P was non-significantly inferior compared with CHOP and the trial was closed early. At a median follow-up of 27·4 months (IQR 16·6-38·4), 23 patients (62%) of 37 assessable patients assigned to CHOP had achieved a complete response or unconfirmed complete response compared with 17 (46%) of 37 assigned to GEM-P (odds ratio 0·52, 95% CI 0·21-1·31; p=0·164). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or worse in both groups were neutropenia (17 [40%] with CHOP and nine [20%] with GEM-P), thrombocytopenia (4 [10%] with CHOP and 13 [30%] with GEM-P, and febrile neutropenia (12 [29%] with CHOP and 3 [7%] with GEM-P). Two patients (5%) died during the study, both in the GEM-P group, from lung infections.

Interpretation: The number of patients with a complete response or unconfirmed complete response did not differ between the groups, indicating that GEM-P was not superior for this outcome. CHOP should therefore remain the reference regimen for previously untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Funding: Bloodwise and the UK National Institute of Health Research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile Toxicity reasons for early study withdrawal were neutropenic sepsis (n=1) in CHOP; and tinnitus (n=2), hearing loss (n=1), peripheral neuropathy (n=1), and thrombocytopenia and anaemia (n=1) in GEM-P. Two deaths occurred in the GEM-P group, both due to lung infections. One patient chose to discontinue GEM-P and commence CHOP off-study at the time of study closure. GEM-P=gemcitabine, cisplatin, and methylprednisolone. CHOP=cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone. ITT=intention-to-treat. *Includes three patients with clinical progression.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Factors potentially predictive of a complete response or unconfirmed complete response Data are from an analysis of outcomes at end of treatment. CHOP=cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone. GEM-P=gemcitabine, cisplatin, and methylprednisolone. ALK-negative ALCL= anaplastic lymphoma kinase-negative anaplastic large cell T-cell lymphoma. AITL=angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma. PTCL NOS=peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified. EATL=enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma. IPI=International Prognostic Index. ··=data not obtainable.

References

    1. Vose JM, Armitage J, Weisenburger D. International peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma study: pathology findings and clinical outcomes international T-cell lymphoma project. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:4124–4130. - PubMed
    1. Pautier P, Devidas A, Delmer A. Angioimmunoblastic-like T-cell non Hodgkin's lymphoma: outcome after chemotherapy in 33 patients and review of the literature. Leuk Lymphoma. 1999;32:545–552. - PubMed
    1. Simon A, Peoch M, Casassus P. Upfront VIP-reinforced-ABVD (VIP-rABVD) is not superior to CHOP/21 in newly diagnosed peripheral T cell lymphoma. Results of the randomized phase III trial GOELAMS-LTP95. Br J Haematol. 2010;151:159–166. - PubMed
    1. Li L, Duan W, Zhang L. The efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, cisplatin, prednisone, thalidomide versus CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T-cell lymphoma with analysis of biomarkers. Br J Haematol. 2017;178:772–780. - PubMed
    1. Abouyabis AN, Shenoy PJ, Sinha R, Flowers CR, Lechowicz MJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of regimens for peripheral T-cell lymphoma. ISRN Hematol. 2011;2011:623924. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts

Associated data