Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Aug;26(8):2503-2509.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4216-z. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of probiotics in people with cancer

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the efficacy and safety of probiotics in people with cancer

Hadeel Hassan et al. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Background/objectives: Probiotics are living microorganisms that confer a health benefit on the host when administered. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of probiotics in adult and paediatric patients diagnosed with cancer.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken (PROSPERO registration: CRD42016050252). Randomised controlled trials (RCT), identified through screening multiple databases were included for analysis of efficacy. Non-randomised controlled trials and case reports were included for safety analysis. Outcomes included the reduction in the incidence and severity of diarrhoea, and adverse events. Where possible, data were combined for meta-analysis using a random-effects model. Planned subgroup analyses were not possible through marked heterogeneity of study characteristics.

Results: Twenty one studies (N = 2982 participants) were included for assessment of efficacy. Probiotics may reduce the incidence of diarrhoea in patients with cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.78, 95% prediction interval (PI) 0.3-0.92, I-sq 36.9%, 5 studies] and the duration of pyrexia [standardised mean difference 0.39 days, 95% CI 0.35-0.43, I-sq 0.01%, 5 studies]. Twenty five studies (N = 2242) were included in the safety analysis. Five case reports showed probiotic-related bacteraemia/fungaemia/positive blood cultures. Definitions and reporting of adverse events were variable and inconsistent.

Conclusions: There remain insufficient studies to assess the true effect of probiotics in people with cancer. Meta-analysis suggests probiotics may be beneficial but further studies are still required. Improved reporting of outcomes and adverse events in clinical trials are required to improve accuracy and confidence of conclusions drawn in future updates.

Keywords: Cancer; Probiotics; Randomised controlled trials (RCT).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):365S-373S - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 2;12 (6):e0178870 - PubMed
    1. Oncologist. 2000;5(3):250-9 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 22;(12):CD004827 - PubMed
    1. Clin Radiol. 1988 Jul;39(4):435-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources