Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug;26(8):1101-1112.
doi: 10.1038/s41431-018-0151-1. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study

Affiliations

Australians' views on personal genomic testing: focus group findings from the Genioz study

Sylvia A Metcalfe et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Personal genomic testing provides healthy individuals with access to information about their genetic makeup for purposes including ancestry, paternity, sporting ability and health. Such tests are available commercially and globally, with accessibility expected to continue to grow, including in Australia; yet little is known of the views/expectations of Australians. Focus groups were conducted within a multi-stage, cross-disciplinary project (Genioz) to explore this. In mid-2015, 56 members of the public participated in seven focus groups, allocated into three age groups: 18-24, 25-49, and ≥50 years. Three researchers coded transcripts independently and generated themes. Awareness of personal genomic testing was low, but most could deduce what "personal genomics" might entail. Very few had heard of the term "direct-to-consumer" testing, which has implications for organisations developing information to support individuals in their decision-making. Participants' understanding of genetics was varied and drawn from several sources. There were diverse perceptions of the relative influence of genetics and environment on health, mental health, behavior, talent, or personality. Views about having a personal genomic test were mixed, with greater interest in health-related tests if they believed there was a reason for doing so. However, many expressed scepticisms about the types of tests available, and how the information might be used; concerns were also raised about privacy and the potential for discrimination. These exploratory findings inform subsequent stages of the Genioz study, thereby contributing to strategies of supporting Australians to understand and make meaningful and well-considered decisions about the benefits, harms, and implications of personal genomic tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Bronwyn Terrill holds a 0.25FTE position with Genome.One, a commercial, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Garvan Institute of Medical Research that offers clinically accredited personal genomic testing. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall design of Genioz study showing five research components. This paper presents findings from stage1, the focus groups

References

    1. Hogarth S, Saukko P. A market in the making: the past, present and future of direct-to-consumer genomics. New Genet Soc. 2017;36:197–208. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2017.1354692. - DOI
    1. Wellbeing Genomics. SkinDNA. 2017. http://www.skindna.com.au/index.html. Accessed 10 Nov 2017.
    1. DNAromance. DNA Romance. 2017. https://www.dnaromance.com/. Accessed 11 Sept 2017.
    1. Caulfield T, McGuire AL. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: perceptions, problems, and policy responses. Annu Rev Med. 2012;63:23–33. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-062110-123753. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Covolo L, Rubinelli S, Ceretti E, Gelatti U. Internet-based direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17:e279. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4378. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources