Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery: is it a draw?
- PMID: 29707285
- PMCID: PMC5906266
- DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.94
Robotic-assisted thoracic surgery versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery: is it a draw?
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Comment on
-
Early outcomes of robotic versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity score-matched study.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Feb 1;53(2):348-352. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx310. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018. PMID: 28957995
References
-
- Bendixen M, Jorgensen OD, Kronborg C, et al. Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:836-44. 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00173-X - DOI - PubMed
-
- NCCN Non-small-cell-lung-cancer guidelines. 2.2018 ed2018. Available online: www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/nscl.pdf
-
- Yang S, Guo W, Chen X, et al. Early outcomes of robotic versus uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a propensity score-matched study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2017. [Epub ahead of print] - PubMed
-
- Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli F, et al. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:244-7. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources