Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Apr 30;4(4):CD004414.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004414.pub3.

Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis

Andrea Bauer  1 , Henriette Rönsch, Peter Elsner, Daan Dittmar, Cathy Bennett, Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar, Judit Lukács, Swen Malte John, Hywel C Williams
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis

Andrea Bauer et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Occupational irritant hand dermatitis (OIHD) causes significant functional impairment, disruption of work, and discomfort in the working population. Different preventive measures such as protective gloves, barrier creams and moisturisers can be used, but it is not clear how effective these are. This is an update of a Cochrane review which was previously published in 2010.

Objectives: To assess the effects of primary preventive interventions and strategies (physical and behavioural) for preventing OIHD in healthy people (who have no hand dermatitis) who work in occupations where the skin is at risk of damage due to contact with water, detergents, chemicals or other irritants, or from wearing gloves.

Search methods: We updated our searches of the following databases to January 2018: the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLlNE, and Embase. We also searched five trials registers and checked the bibliographies of included studies for further references to relevant trials. We handsearched two sets of conference proceedings.

Selection criteria: We included parallel and cross-over randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which examined the effectiveness of barrier creams, moisturisers, gloves, or educational interventions compared to no intervention for the primary prevention of OIHD under field conditions.

Data collection and analysis: We used the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. The primary outcomes were signs and symptoms of OIHD developed during the trials, and the frequency of treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects.

Main results: We included nine RCTs involving 2888 participants without occupational irritant hand dermatitis (OIHD) at baseline. Six studies, including 1533 participants, investigated the effects of barrier creams, moisturisers, or both. Three studies, including 1355 participants, assessed the effectiveness of skin protection education on the prevention of OIHD. No studies were eligible that investigated the effects of protective gloves. Among each type of intervention, there was heterogeneity concerning the criteria for assessing signs and symptoms of OIHD, the products, and the occupations. Selection bias, performance bias, and reporting bias were generally unclear across all studies. The risk of detection bias was low in five studies and high in one study. The risk of other biases was low in four studies and high in two studies.The eligible trials involved a variety of participants, including: metal workers exposed to cutting fluids, dye and print factory workers, gut cleaners in swine slaughterhouses, cleaners and kitchen workers, nurse apprentices, hospital employees handling irritants, and hairdressing apprentices. All studies were undertaken at the respective work places. Study duration ranged from four weeks to three years. The participants' ages ranged from 16 to 67 years.Meta-analyses for barrier creams, moisturisers, a combination of both barrier creams and moisturisers, or skin protection education showed imprecise effects favouring the intervention. Twenty-nine per cent of participants who applied barrier creams developed signs of OIHD, compared to 33% of the controls, so the risk may be slightly reduced with this measure (risk ratio (RR) 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.06; 999 participants; 4 studies; low-quality evidence). However, this risk reduction may not be clinically important. There may be a clinically important protective effect with the use of moisturisers: in the intervention groups, 13% of participants developed symptoms of OIHD compared to 19% of the controls (RR 0.71, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.09; 507 participants; 3 studies; low-quality evidence). Likewise, there may be a clinically important protective effect from using a combination of barrier creams and moisturisers: 8% of participants in the intervention group developed signs of OIHD, compared to 13% of the controls (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.42; 474 participants; 2 studies; low-quality evidence). We are uncertain whether skin protection education reduces the risk of developing signs of OIHD (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.08; 1355 participants; 3 studies; very low-quality evidence). Twenty-one per cent of participants who received skin protection education developed signs of OIHD, compared to 28% of the controls.None of the studies addressed the frequency of treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects of the products directly. However, in three studies of barrier creams, the reasons for withdrawal from the studies were unrelated to adverse effects. Likewise, in one study of moisturisers plus barrier creams, and in one study of skin protection education, reasons for dropout were unrelated to adverse effects. The remaining studies (one to two in each comparison) reported dropouts without stating how many of them may have been due to adverse reactions to the interventions. We judged the quality of this evidence as moderate, due to the indirectness of the results. The investigated interventions to prevent OIHD probably cause few or no serious adverse effects.

Authors' conclusions: Moisturisers used alone or in combination with barrier creams may result in a clinically important protective effect, either in the long- or short-term, for the primary prevention of OIHD. Barrier creams alone may have slight protective effect, but this does not appear to be clinically important. The results for all of these comparisons were imprecise, and the low quality of the evidence means that our confidence in the effect estimates is limited. For skin protection education, the results varied substantially across the trials, the effect was imprecise, and the pooled risk reduction was not large enough to be clinically important. The very low quality of the evidence means that we are unsure as to whether skin protection education reduces the risk of developing OIHD. The interventions probably cause few or no serious adverse effects.We conclude that at present there is insufficient evidence to confidently assess the effectiveness of interventions used in the primary prevention of OIHD. This does not necessarily mean that current measures are ineffective. Even though the update of this review included larger studies of reasonable quality, there is still a need for trials which apply standardised measures for the detection of OIHD in order to determine the effectiveness of the different prevention strategies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Andrea Bauer: "I have received lecture fees from manufacturers of skin care and protection products (Spirig, Astellas, GSK, and La Roche‐Posay). I was the chief investigator (lead author) of an excluded study (Bauer 2002)."

Henriette Rönsch: none known.

Peter Elsner: "I was the co‐author of an excluded study (Bauer 2002)."

Daan Dittmar: none known.

Cathy Bennett: "I am the proprietor of Systematic Research Ltd., and received a consultancy fee for my work on this review."

Marie‐Louise A Schuttelaar: none known.

Judit Lukács: none known.

Swen Malte John: "I have received lecture fees from Galderma, Admirall, and Biogen‐Idec."

Hywel C Williams: "I have helped a team led by Dr Ira Madan in London to design and deliver a national clinical trial to prevent occupational irritant hand dermatitis in nurses, which is due to start recruiting in late 2014. The study will probably report in 2017 or 2018, and at some point will be eligible for inclusion in this systematic review future update. The trial tests the behavioural package alongside supply of emollients at work. I was the co‐author of an excluded study (Bauer 2002)."

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram including all previous searches.
2
2
Methodological quality summary: review authors' judgements about each methodological quality item for each included study.
3
3
'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each 'Risk of bias' item presented as percentages across all included studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

References to studies included in this review

Brüning 2008 {published data only}
    1. Brüning T, Goldscheid N, Haufs M, Merget R, Pesch B, Schöneweis S, et al. Intervention study 'Skin Protection'. Comparative investigation to test the effectiveness of skin protection preparations in line with the three‐step skin protection program ‐ hazard analysis and protective measures [Interventionsstudie „Hautschutz“. Vergleichende Untersuchung zur Überprüfung der Wirksamkeit von Hautschutzpräparaten im Rahmen des dreistufigen Hautschutzplanes ‐ Gefährdungsanalyse und Schutzmaßnahme; Erratum 04.05.2016]. In: BGFA – Forschungsinstitut für Arbeitsmedizin der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung editor(s). BGFA‐Report 1. Bochum: Institut der Ruhr‐Universität Bochum, 2008 and Erratum 2016.
    1. Dickel H, Pesch B, Leiste A, Schoeneweis S, Haufs M, Taeger D, et al. Occupational study of the effectiveness of barrier creams and moisturizers. Contact Dermatitis 2006;55(Suppl 1):39. [CENTRAL: CN‐00616076]
    1. Leiste A, Dickel H, Pesch B, Taeger D, Goldscheid N, Haufs M, et al. Efficacy of barrier creams and skin care ointments in employees exposed to cooling agents. A randomised controlled intervention study [Die Wirksamkeit von Hautschutz ‐ und Hautpflegemitteln unter Kühlschmierstoffexposition ‐ Eine randomisierte kontrollierte Interventionsstudie]. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft (JDDG) 2007;5(Suppl 2):S186‐7.
Duca 1994 {published data only}
    1. Duca PG, Pelfini G, Ferguglia G, Settimi L, Peverelli C, Sevosi I, et al. Efficacy of barrier creams in preventing skin complaints in workers of a fabric dyeing and printing factory. Results of a random experiment. [Efficia dell'uso di creme‐barriera nel prevenire affezioni dermatologiche in lavoratori delle tintostamperie: Risultati di una sperimentatione randomizzata]. La Medicina del Lavoro 1994;85(3):231‐8. [CENTRAL: CN‐00169944] - PubMed
Flyvholm 2005 {published data only (unpublished sought but not used)}
    1. Flyvholm MA, Mygind K, Sell L, Jensen A, Jepsen KF. A randomised controlled intervention study on prevention of work related skin problems among gut cleaners in swine slaughterhouses. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2005;62(9):642‐9. [CENTRAL: CN‐00523951] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mygind K, Borg V, Flyvholm MA, Sell L, Frydendall Jepsen K. A study of the implementation process of an intervention to prevent work‐related skin problems in wet‐work occupations. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2006;79(1):66‐74. [CENTRAL: CN‐00561164] - PubMed
Goh 1994 {published data only}
    1. Goh CL, Gan SL. Efficacies of a barrier cream and an after work emollient cream against cutting fluid dermatitis in metalworkers: A prospective study. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31(3):176‐80. [PUBMED: 7821012] - PubMed
Halkier‐Sørensen 1993 {published data only}
    1. Halkier‐Sørensen L, Thesterup‐Pedersen K. The efficacy of a moisturizer (Locobase) among cleaners and kitchen assistants during everyday exposure to water and detergents. Contact Dermatitis 1993;29(5):266‐71. [CENTRAL: CN‐00099282] - PubMed
Kütting 2010 {published data only}
    1. Kütting B, Baumeister T, Weistenhöfer W, Pfahlberg A, Uter W, Drexler H. Effectiveness of skin protection measures in prevention of occupational hand eczema: Results of a prospective randomized controlled trial over a follow‐up period of 1 year. British Journal of Dermatology 2010;162(2):362‐70. [CENTRAL: CN‐00752880] - PubMed
Löffler 2006 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Löffler H, Bruckner T, Diepgen T, Effendy I. Primary prevention in health care employees: A prospective intervention study with a 3‐year training period. Contact Dermatitis 2006;54(4):202‐9. [CENTRAL: CN‐00564898] - PubMed
Meer 2015 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Meer EW, Boot CR, Jungbauer FH, Klink JJ, Rustemeyer T, Coenraads PJ, et al. Hands4U: a multifaceted strategy to implement guideline‐based recommendations to prevent hand eczema in health care workers: design of a randomised controlled trial and (cost) effectiveness evaluation. BMC Public Health 2011;11(669):1‐11. [CENTRAL: CN‐00806279] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meer EW, Boot CR, Twisk JW, Coenraads PJ, Jungbauer FH, Gulden JW, et al. Hands4U: The effectiveness of a multifaceted implementation strategy on behaviour related to the prevention of hand eczema ‐ A randomised controlled trial among healthcare workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2014;71(7):492‐9. [CENTRAL: CN‐00996155] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meer EW, Boot CR, Gulden JW, Knol DL, Jungbauer FH, Coenraads PJ, et al. Hands4U: the effects of a multifaceted implementation strategy on hand eczema prevalence in a healthcare setting. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Contact Dermatitis 2015;72(5):312‐24. [CENTRAL: CN‐01254728] - PubMed
    1. Meer EW, Dongen JM, Boot CR, Gulden JW, Bosmans JE, Anema JR. Economic evaluation of a multifaceted implementation strategy for the prevention of hand eczema among healthcare workers in comparison with a control group: the Hands4U Study. Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 2016;96(4):499‐504. [CENTRAL: CN‐01178190] - PubMed
Perrenoud 2001a {published data only}
    1. Perrenoud D, Gallezot D, Melle G. The efficacy of a protective cream in a real‐world apprentice hairdresser environment. Contact Dermatitis 2001;45(3):134‐8. [CENTRAL: CN‐00770005] - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Amphoux 1975 {published data only}
    1. Amphoux M, Robin J. Double blind test with a protective ointment (Ivosin) on the hands of cement workers [Doppelblindversuch mit einer Schutzsalbe (Ivosin) an den Händen von Zementarbeitern]. Berufs‐Dermatosen 1975;23(6):214‐26. [CENTRAL: CN‐00705625] - PubMed
Arbogast 2004 {published data only}
    1. Arbogast JW, Fendler EJ, Hammond BS, Cartner TJ, Dolan MD, Ali Y, et al. Effectiveness of a hand care regimen with a moisturizer in manufacturing facilities where the workers are prone to occupational irritant dermatitis. Dermatitis 2004;15(1):10‐7. [PUBMED: 15573643] - PubMed
Bauer 2002 {published data only}
    1. Bauer A, Kelterer D, Bartsch R, Schlegel A, Pearson J, Stadeler M, et al. Prevention of hand dermatitis in bakers' apprentices: different efficacy of skin protection measures and UVB hardening. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2002;75(7):491‐9. [PUBMED: 12172896] - PubMed
Berndt 2000 {published data only}
    1. Berndt U, Wigger‐Alberti W, Gabard B, Elsner P. Efficacy of a barrier cream and its vehicle as protective measures against occupational irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 2000;42(2):77‐80. [CENTRAL: CN‐00275795] - PubMed
Bolam 1971 {published data only}
    1. Bolam RM, Hepworth R, Bowerman LT. In‐use evaluation of safety to skin of enzyme‐containing washing products. British Medical Journal 1971;2(5760):499‐501. [CENTRAL: CN‐00005787] - PMC - PubMed
Bregnhøj 2012 {published data only}
    1. Bregnhøj A, Menné T, Johansen JD, Søsted H. Prevention of hand eczema among Danish hairdressing apprentices: an intervention study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2012;69(5):310‐6. [PUBMED: 22267449] - PubMed
Brown 2007 {published data only}
    1. Brown TP, Rushton L, Williams HC, English JS. Intervention implementation research: An explorative study of reduction strategies for occupational contact dermatitis in the printing industry. Contact Dermatitis 2007;56:16‐20. - PubMed
Davis 2005 {published data only}
    1. Davis DD, Harper RA. Using gloves coated with a dermal therapy formula to improve skin condition. Association of periOperative Registered Nurses (AORN) Journal 2005;81:157‐66. - PubMed
Dobson 1979 {published data only}
    1. Dobson RL. Evaluation of hand cleansers. Contact Dermatitis 1979;5(5):305‐7. [CENTRAL: CN‐00568793] - PubMed
Frosch 2003 {published data only}
    1. Frosch PJ, Peiler D, Grunert V, Grunenberg B. Efficacy of barrier creams in comparison to skin care products in dental laboratory technicians ‐ A controlled trial. Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft [Journal of the German Society of Dermatology] 2003;1(7):547‐57. [CENTRAL: CN‐00474825] - PubMed
Glantz 1976 {published data only}
    1. Glantz PO, Larsson K, Nyquist G. A new skin protecting ointment against acrylic resins. Odontologisk Revy 1976;27(4):265‐72. [PUBMED: 138105] - PubMed
Held 2001 {published data only}
    1. Held E, Wolff C, Gyntelberg F, Agner T. Prevention of work‐related skin problems in student auxiliary nurses. Contact Dermatitis 2001;44(5):297‐303. [CENTRAL: CN‐00347186] - PubMed
Held 2002 {published data only}
    1. Held E, Mygind K, Wolff C, Gyntelberg F, Agner T. Prevention of work related skin problems: An intervention study in wet work employees. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2002;59(8):556‐61. [PUBMED: 12151613] - PMC - PubMed
McCormick 2000 {published data only}
    1. McCormick RD, Buchman TL, Maki DG. Double‐blind, randomized trial of a scheduled use of a novel barrier cream and an oil‐containing lotion for protecting hands of health care workers. American Journal of Infection Control 2000;28(4):302‐10. [CENTRAL: CN‐00298736] - PubMed
Mody 2003 {published data only}
    1. Mody L, McNeil SA, Sun R, Bradley SF, Kauffman C. Introduction of a waterless alcohol‐based hand rub in a long‐term‐care facility. Infection control and hospital epidemiology 2003;24(3):165‐71. [CENTRAL: CN‐00436468] - PubMed
Perrenoud 2001b {published data only}
    1. Perrenoud D, Gallezot D, Lübbe J, Akapko C, Ruffieux C, Melle G, et al. Effect of a protective cream against skin irritation associated with hand hygiene practices: preliminary report. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2001;49(1 A):91‐4. [CENTRAL: CN‐00424757]
Schwanitz 2003 {published data only}
    1. Schwanitz HJ, Riehl U, Schlesinger T, Bock M, Skudlik C, Wulfhorst B. Skin care management: Educational aspects. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2003;76(5):374‐81. [PUBMED: 12719982 ] - PubMed
Sell 2005 {published data only}
    1. Sell L, Flyvholm MA, Lindhard G, Mygind K. Implementation of an occupational skin disease prevention programme in Danish cheese dairies. Contact Dermatitis 2005;53(3):155‐61. [PUBMED: 16128755] - PubMed
Winker 2009 {published data only}
    1. Winker R, Salameh B, Stolkovich S, Nikl M, Barth A, Ponocny E, et al. Effectiveness of skin protection creams in the prevention of occupational dermatitis: Results of a randomized, controlled trial. International Archives of Occupational & Environmental Health 2009;82(5):653‐62. [CENTRAL: CN‐00705763] - PubMed
Winnefeld 2000 {published data only}
    1. Winnefeld M, Richard MA, Drancourt M, Grob JJ. Skin tolerance and effectiveness of two hand decontamination procedures in everyday hospital use. British Journal of Dermatology 2000;143(3):546‐50. [CENTRAL: CN‐00332205] - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Visscher 2014 {published data only}
    1. Visscher MO, DiMuzio A, Jones J, Adams L, Billhimer W. Effect of pseudoceramide cream on irritant hand dermatitis in health care workers. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2014;70(5 Suppl 1):AB68. [EMBASE: 71390362]

References to ongoing studies

Madan 2016 {published data only}
    1. Madan I, Parsons V, Cookson B, English J, Lavender T, McCrone P, et al. A behavioural change package to prevent hand dermatitis in nurses working in the national health service (the SCIN trial): Study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial. Trials 2016;17(1):145. [PUBMED: 26987818] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Madan I, Parsons V, Cookson B, English J, Lavender T, McCrone P, et al. The SCIN (Skin Care Intervention in Nurses) trial: A cluster randomized trial. Contact Dermatitis 2016;75:101‐2. [EMBASE: 612248209]
Soltanipoor 2016 {published data only}
    1. Soltanipoor M, Hines J, Sluiter J, Kezic S, Rustemeyer T. The Healthy Hands Project: Effectiveness of a skincare programme for the prevention of contact dermatitis in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 2016;75:100. [EMBASE: 612248185]

Additional references

Agner 1991
    1. Agner T. Basal transepidermal water loss, skin thickness, skin blood flow and skin colour in relation to sodium‐lauryl‐sulfate‐induced irritation in normal skin. Contact Dermatitis 1991;25(2):108‐14. [PUBMED: 1935039] - PubMed
Bauer 1997
    1. Bauer A, Seidel A, Bartsch R, Wollina U, Gebhardt M, Diepgen TL. Development of skin damage during vocational training in occupations with skin hazards [Entwicklung von Hautproblemen bei Berufsanfängern in Hautrisikoberufen]. Allergologie 1997;20(4):179‐83. [EMBASE: 1997155320]
Bauer 1998
    1. Bauer A, Bartsch R, Stadeler M, Schneider W, Grieshaber R, Wollina U, et al. Development of occupational skin diseases during vocational training in baker and confectioner apprentices: A follow up study. Contact Dermatitis 1998;39(6):307‐11. [PUBMED: 9874022] - PubMed
Bauer 2001
    1. Bauer A, Bartsch R, Hersmann C, Stadeler M, Kelterer K, Schneider W, et al. Occupational hand dermatitis in food industry apprentices: Results of a three year follow up cohort study. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2001;74(6):437‐42. [PUBMED: 11563607] - PubMed
Bock 2001
    1. Bock M, Wulfhorst B, Gabard B, Schwanitz HJ. Efficacy of skin protection creams for the treatment of irritant dermatitis in hairdresser apprentices. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2001;49(1A):73‐6. [EMBASE: 2001126305]
Boehm 2012
    1. Boehm D, Schmid‐Ott G, Finkeldey F, John SM, Dwinger C, Werfel T, et al. Anxiety, depression and impaired health‐related quality of life in patients with occupational hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2012;67(4):184‐92. [PUBMED: 22564098] - PubMed
Boman 1989
    1. Boman A, Mellström GA. Percutaneous absorption of 3 organic solvents in the guinea pig. (III). Effect of barrier creams. Contact Dermatitis 1989;21(3):134‐40. [PUBMED: 2791538] - PubMed
Brans 2016
    1. Brans R, Skudlik C, Weisshaar E, Scheidt R, Ofenloch R, Elsner P, et al. Multicentre cohort study 'Rehabilitation of Occupational Skin Diseases ‐ Optimization and Quality Assurance of Inpatient Management (ROQ)': results from a 3‐year follow‐up. Contact Dermatitis 2016;75(4):205‐12. [PUBMED: 27356809] - PubMed
Burnett 1998
    1. Burnett CA, Lushniak BD, McCarthy W, Kaufman J. Occupational dermatitis causing days away from work in U.S. private industry, 1993. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 1998;34(6):568‐73. [PUBMED: 9816414] - PubMed
Cherry 2000
    1. Cherry N, Meyer JD, Adisesh A, Brooke R, Owen‐Smith V, Swales C, et al. Surveillance of occupational skin disease: EPIDERM and OPRA. British Journal of Dermatology 2000;142(6):1128‐34. [PUBMED: 10848735] - PubMed
Coenraads 1998
    1. Coenraads PJ, Diepgren TL. Risk for hand eczema for employees with past or present atopic dermatitis. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 1998;71(1):7‐13. [PUBMED: 9523243] - PubMed
Coenraads 2003
    1. Coenraads PJ, Diepgen TL. Problems with trials and intervention studies on barrier creams and emollients at the workplace. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2003;76(5):362‐6. [PUBMED: 12768427] - PubMed
Cvetkovski 2005
    1. Cvetkovski RS, Rothman KJ, Olsen J, Mathiesen B, Iversen L, Johansen JD, et al. Relation between diagnoses on severity, sick leave and loss of job among patients with occupational hand eczema. British Journal of Dermatology 2005;152(1):93‐8. [PUBMED: 15656807] - PubMed
De Paepe 2000
    1. Paepe K, Derde MP, Roseeuw D, Rogier V. Claim substantiation and efficacy of hydrating body lotions and protective creams. Contact Dermatitis 2000;42(4):227‐34. [PUBMED: 10750855] - PubMed
DGUV 2008
    1. DGUV (Deutsche gesetzliche Unfallversicherung). Business report of the German Statutory Accident Insurances 2008. In: Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung editor(s). Geschäfts‐ und Rechnungsergebnisse der gewerblichen Berufsgenossenschaften und Versicherungsträger der öffentlichen Hand 2008. Paderborn: Bonifatius GmbH, 2009.
Dickel 2003
    1. Dickel H, Bruckner TM, Schmidt A, Diepgen TL. Impact of atopic skin diathesis on occupational skin disease incidence in a working population. Journal of Investigative Dermatology 2003;121(1):37‐40. [PUBMED: 12839561] - PubMed
Diepgen 1996
    1. Diepgen TL, Schmidt A, Berg A, Plinske W. Occupational retraining in employees suffering from occupational skin disease [Berufliche Rehabilitation von hautkranken Beschäftigten]. Deutsches Arzteblatt 1996;93:31‐40.
Diepgen 1999
    1. Diepgen TL, Coenraads PJ. The epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 1999;72(8):496‐506. [PUBMED: 10592001] - PubMed
Diepgen 2002
    1. Diepgen TL, Schmidt A. Are incidence and prevalence of occupational dermatoses underestimated? [Werden Inzidenz und Prävalenz berufsbedingter Hauterkrankungen unterschätzt?]. Arbeitsmedizin, Sozialmedizin, Praventivmedizin 2002;37:477‐80.
Diepgen 2003
    1. Diepgen TL. Occupational skin‐disease data in Europe. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2003;76(5):331‐8. [PUBMED: 12690490] - PubMed
Diepgen 2013
    1. Diepgen TL, Scheidt R, Weisshaar E, John SM, Hieke K. Cost of illness from occupational hand eczema in Germany. Contact Dermatitis 2013;69(2):99‐106. [PUBMED: 23869729] - PubMed
Dulon 2009
    1. Dulon M, Skudlik C, Nübling M, John SM, Nienhaus A. Validity and responsiveness of the Osnabrück Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI): A methodological study. British Journal of Dermatology 2009;160(1):137‐42. [PUBMED: 19016701] - PubMed
Fartasch 1995
    1. Fartasch M. Human barrier formation and reaction to irritation. Current Problems in Dermatology 1995;23:95‐103. [PUBMED: 9035933] - PubMed
Fischer 1998
    1. Fischer T, Greif C, Wigger‐Alberti W, Elsner P. Instrumental methods for the evaluation of effectiveness and safety of cosmetic products [Instrumentelle methoden zur bewertung der sicherheit und wirksamkeit von kosmetika]. Aktuelle Dermatologie 1998;24(8‐9):243‐50. [EMBASE: 1998322618]
Fluhr 2007
    1. Fluhr JW, Miteva M, Elsner P. Efficacy and safety testing. The clinical perspective. Current Problems in Dermatology 2007;34:33‐46. [PUBMED: 17312355] - PubMed
Frosch 1994
    1. Frosch PJ, Kurte A. Efficacy of barrier creams (IV). The repetitive irritation test (RIT) with a set of 4 standard irritants. Contact Dermatitis 1994;31(3):161‐8. [PUBMED: 7821009] - PubMed
Gabard 1995
    1. Gabard B, Treffel P, Charton‐Picard F, Eloy R. Irritant reactions on hairless micropig skin: A model for testing barrier creams. Current Problems in Dermatology 1995;23:275‐87. [PUBMED: 9035922] - PubMed
GRADEpro GDT 2015 [Computer program]
    1. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.). GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime, Inc.), 2015.
Held 2005
    1. Held E, Skoet R, Johansen JD, Agner T. The hand eczema severity index (HECSI): A scoring system for clinical assessment of hand eczema. A study of inter‐ and intraobserver reliability. British Journal of Dermatology 2005;152(2):302‐7. [PUBMED: 15727643] - PubMed
Henry 1994
    1. Henry NW. Protective gloves for occupational use ‐ US rules, regulations, and standards. In: Mehlström GA, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI editor(s). Protective gloves for occupational use. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1994:45‐9.
Higgins 2008
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.0 [updated February 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Hines 2017
    1. Hines J, Wilkinson SM, John SM, Diepgen TL, English J, Rustemeyer T, et al. The three moments of skin cream application: an evidence‐based proposal for use of skin creams in the prevention of irritant contact dermatitis in the workplace. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV 2017;31(1):53‐64. [PUBMED: 27545662] - PMC - PubMed
Hogan 1990
    1. Hogan DJ, Dannaker CJ, Lal S, Maibach HI. An international survey on the prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis of the hands. Dermatosen in Beruf und Umwelt. Occupation and Environment 1990;38(5):143‐7. [PUBMED: 2149550] - PubMed
Holness 2013
    1. Holness DL. Recent advances in occupational dermatitis. Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2013;13(2):145‐50. [PUBMED: 23324811] - PubMed
Johansen 2011
    1. Johansen JD, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin J‐P (Eds.). Contact Dermatitis. 5th Edition. Springer, 2011.
Jowett 1985
    1. Jowett S, Ryan T. Skin disease and handicap: An analysis of the impact of skin conditions. Social Science & Medicine 1985;20(4):425‐9. [PUBMED: 3158080] - PubMed
Juni 2001
    1. Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 2001;323(7303):42‐6. [PUBMED: 11440947] - PMC - PubMed
Kampf 2007
    1. Kampf G, Löffler H. Prevention of irritant contact dermatitis among health care workers by using evidence‐based hand hygiene practices: a review. Industrial Health 2007;45(5):645‐52. [PUBMED: 18057807] - PubMed
Karjalainen 1998
    1. Karjalainen A, Aalto L, Jolanski R, Keskinen H, Savela A. Occupational skin disease in Finland in 1996. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH), 1998.
Kezic 2009
    1. Kezic S, Visser MJ, Verberk MM. Individual susceptibility to occupational contact dermatitis. Industrial Health 2009;47(5):469‐78. [PUBMED: 19834255] - PubMed
Kütting 2003
    1. Kütting B, Drexler H. Effectiveness of skin protection creams as a preventive measure in occupational Dermatitis: a critical update according to criteria of evidence‐based medicine. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 2003;76(4):253‐9. [PUBMED: 12684811 ] - PubMed
Kütting 2008
    1. Kütting B, Drexler H. The three‐step programme of skin protection. A useful instrument of primary prevention or more effective in secondary prevention?. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) 2008;133(5):201‐5. [PUBMED: 18213554] - PubMed
Lachapelle 1996
    1. Lachapelle JM. Efficacy of protective creams and/or gels. Current Problems in Dermatology 1996;25:182‐92. [PUBMED: 9026410] - PubMed
Lerbaek 2008
    1. Lerbaek A, Kyvik KO, Ravn H, Menne T, Agner T. Clinical characteristics and consequences of hand eczema ‐ An 8‐year follow‐up study of a population‐based twin cohort. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58(4):210‐6. [PUBMED: 18353028] - PubMed
Leveque 1983
    1. Leveque JL, Rigal J. Impedance methods for studying skin moisturization. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists 1983;34:419‐28.
Loden 1997
    1. Loden M. Barrier recovery and influence of irritant stimuli in skin treated with a moisturizing cream. Contact Dermatitis 1997;36(5):256‐60. [PUBMED: 9197961] - PubMed
Lodi 2000
    1. Lodi A, Mancini LL, Ambonati M, Coassini A, Ravanelli G, Crosti C. Epidemiology of occupational contact dermatitis in a North Italian population. European Journal of Dermatology 2000;10(2):128‐32. [PUBMED: 10694312] - PubMed
Mahmoud 1984
    1. Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM, Neste D. Histological assessment of skin damage by irritants: Its possible use in the evaluation of a 'barrier cream'. Contact Dermatitis 1984;11(3):179‐85. [PUBMED: 6499417] - PubMed
Mahmoud 1985
    1. Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM. Evaluation of the protective value of an antisorbent gel by Laser Doppler flowmetry and histology. Contact Dermatitis 1985;13(1):14‐9. [PUBMED: 2931238] - PubMed
Malten 1981
    1. Malten KE. Thoughts on irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatits 1981;7(5):238‐47. [PUBMED: 7030611] - PubMed
Mathias 1985
    1. Mathias CG. The cost of occupational skin disease. Archives of Dermatology 1985;121(3):332‐4. [PUBMED: 3156562] - PubMed
Mathias 1990
    1. Mathias CG. Prevention of occupational contact dermatitis. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1990;23(4 pt 1):742‐8. [PUBMED: 2146291] - PubMed
McFadden 2001
    1. McFadden JP. Hand eczema. In: Rycroft RJG, Menne T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP editor(s). Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer, 2001:403‐411.
Meding 1987
    1. Meding B, Swanbeck G. Prevalence of hand eczema in an industrial city. British Journal of Dermatology 1987;116(5):627‐34. [PUBMED: 2954578] - PubMed
Meding 1990
    1. Meding B, Swanbeck G. Consequences of having hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 1990;23(1):6‐14. [PUBMED: 2144814] - PubMed
Meding 2005
    1. Meding B, Wrangsjö K, Järvholm B. Fifteen‐year follow‐up of hand eczema: Persistence and consequences. British Journal of Dermatology 2005;152(5):975‐80. [PUBMED: 15888155] - PubMed
Mellström 1994
    1. Mellström GA, Carlsson B. European standards on protective gloves. In: Mellström GA, Wahlberg JE, Maibach HI editor(s). Protective gloves for occupational use. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 1994:39‐43.
Nicholson 2010
    1. Nicholson PJ. Evidence‐based guidelines: occupational contact dermatitis and urticaria. Occupational Medicine 2010;60(7):502‐4. [PUBMED: 20871017] - PubMed
NOSQ 2002
    1. Flyvholm M‐A, Susitaival P, Meding B, Kanerva L, Lindberg M, Svensson Å, Ólafsson J H. Nordic Occupational Skin Questionnaire – NOSQ–2002. Nordic questionnaire for surveying work‐related skin diseases on hands and forearms and relevant exposures. TemaNord Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministers. Vol. 518, Copenhagen: Nordic Council of Ministers, 2002:1‐186.
Patterson 1999
    1. Patterson SE, Williams JV, Marks JG Jr. Prevention of sodium lauryl sulfate irritant contact dermatitis by Pro‐Q aerosol foam skin protectant. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 1999;40(5 Pt 1):783‐5. [PUBMED: 10321615] - PubMed
Pinnagoda 1989
    1. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. Comparability and reproducibility of the results of water loss measurement: A study of 4 evaporimeters. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20(4):241‐6. [PUBMED: 2752735] - PubMed
Pinnagoda 1990
    1. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Agner T, Serup J. Guidelines for transepidermal water loss (TEWL) measurement. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1990;22(3):164‐78. [PUBMED: 2335090] - PubMed
Politiek 2016
    1. Politiek K, Oosterhaven JA, Vermeulen KM, Schuttelaar ML. Systematic review of cost‐of‐illness studies in hand eczema. Contact Dermatitis 2016;75(2):67‐76. [PUBMED: 27218305] - PubMed
Ramsing 1996
    1. Ramsing DW, Agner T. Effect of glove occlusion on human skin (II). Long term experimental exposure. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34(4):258‐62. [PUBMED: 8730163] - PubMed
Ramsing 1997
    1. Ramsing DW, Agner T. Preventive and therapeutic effects of a moisturizer. An experimental study in human skin. Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 1997;77(5):335‐7. [PUBMED: 9298122] - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Rietschel 1997
    1. Rietschel RL. Mechanisms in irritant contact dermatitis. Clinics in Dermatology 1997;15(4):557‐9. [PUBMED: 9255462] - PubMed
Rogiers 2001
    1. Rogiers V, EEMCO Group. EEMCO guidance for the assessment of transepidermal water loss in cosmetic sciences. Skin Pharmacology and Applied Skin Physiology 2001;14(2):117‐28. [PUBMED: 11316970] - PubMed
Rose 2009
    1. Rose RF, Lyons P, Horne H, Wilkinson MS. A review of the materials and allergens in protective gloves. Contact Dermatitis 2009;61(3):129‐37. [PUBMED: 19780770] - PubMed
Saary 2005
    1. Saary J, Qureshi R, Palda V, DeKoven J, Pratt M, Skotnicki‐Grant S, et al. A systematic review of contact dermatitis treatment and prevention. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2005;53(5):845. [PUBMED: 16243136] - PubMed
Saetterstrøm 2014
    1. Saetterstrøm B, Olsen J, Johansen JD. Cost‐of‐illness of patients with contact dermatitis in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis 2014;71(3):154‐61. [PUBMED: 24750019] - PubMed
Schliemann 2014
    1. Schliemann S, Petri M, Elsner P. Preventing irritant contact dermatitis with protective creams: influence of the application dose. Contact Dermatitis 2014;70(1):19‐26. [PUBMED: 23844826] - PubMed
Schünemann 2013
    1. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A, editors. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013.
Skoet 2004
    1. Skoet R, Olsen J, Mathiesen B, Iversen L, Johansen JD, Agner T. A survey of occupational hand eczema in Denmark. Contact Dermatitis 2004;51(4):159‐66. [PUBMED: 15500664] - PubMed
Smit 1993
    1. Smit HA, Burdorf A, Coenraads PJ. The prevalence of hand dermatitis in different occupations. International Journal of Epidemiology 1993;22(2):288‐93. [PUBMED: 8505186] - PubMed
Smit 1994
    1. Smit HA, Rijssen A, Vandenbroucke JP, Coenraads PJ. Susceptibility to and incidence of hand dermatitis in a cohort of apprentice hairdressers and nurses. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 1994;20(2):113‐21. [PUBMED: 8079132] - PubMed
Treffel 1994
    1. Treffel P, Gabard B, Juch R. Evaluation of barrier creams: An in vitro technique on human skin. Acta Dermato‐Venereologica 1994;74(1):7‐11. [PUBMED: 7511868] - PubMed
Tupker 1989a
    1. Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. The influence of the repeated exposure of surfactants on the human skin as determined by transepidermal water loss and visual scoring. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20(2):108‐14. [PUBMED: 2706957] - PubMed
Tupker 1989b
    1. Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. Baseline transepidermal water loss (TEWL) as a prediction of susceptibility to sodium lauryl sulfate. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20(4):265‐9. [PUBMED: 2752737] - PubMed
Uter 1998a
    1. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Schwanitz HJ. Prevalence and incidence of hand dermatitis in hairdressing apprentices: Results of the POSH study. Prevention of occupational skin disease in hairdressers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 1998;71(7):487‐92. [PUBMED: 9826082] - PubMed
Uter 1998b
    1. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Schwanitz H J. Hand eczema in a prospectively‐followed cohort of office‐workers. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38(2):83–9. [PUBMED: 9506220] - PubMed
Uter 1999
    1. Uter W, Pfahlberg A, Gefeller O, Schwanitz HJ. Hand dermatitis in a prospectively followed cohort of hairdressing apprentices: Final results of the POSH study. Contact Dermatitis 1999;41(5):280‐6. [PUBMED: 10554064] - PubMed
Van Gils 2011
    1. Gils RF, Boot CR, Gils PF, Bruynzeel D, Coenraads PJ, Mechelen W, et al. Effectiveness of prevention programmes for hand dermatitis: a systematic review of the literature. Contact Dermatitis 2011;64(2):63‐72. [PUBMED: 21210820] - PubMed
Wahlberg 1996
    1. Wahlberg JE, Boman AS. Prevention of contact dermatitis from solvents. Current Problems in Dermatology 1996;25:57‐66. [PUBMED: 8787589] - PubMed
Wigger‐Alberti 1997
    1. Wigger‐Alberti W, Elsner P. Preventive measures in contact dermatitis. Clinics in Dermatology 1997;15(4):661‐5. [PUBMED: 9255478] - PubMed
Wigger‐Alberti 1998
    1. Wigger‐Alberti W, Elsner P. Do barrier creams and gloves prevent or provoke contact dermatitis?. American Journal of Contact Dermatitis 1998;9(2):100‐6. [PUBMED: 9601897] - PubMed
Williams 2010
    1. Williams C, Wilkinson SM, McShane P, Lewis J, Pennington D, Pierce S, et al. A double‐blind, randomized study to assess the effectiveness of different moisturizers in preventing dermatitis induced by hand washing to simulate healthcare use. British Journal of Dermatology 2010;162(5):1088‐92. [PUBMED: 20199550] - PubMed
Wrangsjö 1994
    1. Wrangsjö K, Osterman K, Hage‐Hamsten M. Glove‐related skin symptoms among operation theatre and dental care unit personnel. (I) Interview investigation. Contact Dermatitis 1994;30(2):102‐7. [PUBMED: 8187484] - PubMed
Wulfhorst 2011
    1. Wulfhorst B, Bock M, Skudlik C, Wigger‐Alberti W, John SM. Prevention of hand eczema – gloves, barrier creams and workers’ education. In: Duus Johansen J, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP editor(s). Contact Dermatitis. 5th Edition. Berlin: Springer, 2001:305‐45.
Zhai 1996
    1. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Effect of barrier creams: Human skin in vivo. Contact Dermatitis 1996;35(2):92‐6. [PUBMED: 8917826] - PubMed
Zhai 1998
    1. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Moisturizers in preventing irritant contact dermatitis: An overview. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38(5):241‐4. [PUBMED: 9667439] - PubMed
Zhai 2006
    1. Zhai H, Maibach HI. Barrier creams. In: Chew A‐L, Maibach HI editor(s). Irritant Dermatitis. Berlin: Springer, 2006.
Zimmerli 1996
    1. Zimmerli T. European standards on protective gloves. Current Problems in Dermatology 1996;25(177):P6. [PUBMED: 8787602] - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Bauer 2010
    1. Bauer A, Schmitt J, Bennett C, Coenraads PJ, Elsner P, English J, et al. Interventions for preventing occupational irritant hand dermatitis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 6. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004414.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources