Augmented reality for the surgeon: Systematic review

Abstract

Introduction: Since the introduction of wearable head-up displays, there has been much interest in the surgical community adapting this technology into routine surgical practice.

Methods: We used the keywords augmented reality OR wearable device OR head-up display AND surgery using PubMed, EBSCO, IEEE and SCOPUS databases. After exclusions, 74 published articles that evaluated the utility of wearable head-up displays in surgical settings were included in our review.

Results: Across all studies, the most common use of head-up displays was in cases of live streaming from surgical microscopes, navigation, monitoring of vital signs, and display of preoperative images. The most commonly used head-up display was Google Glass. Head-up displays enhanced surgeons' operating experience; common disadvantages include limited battery life, display size and discomfort.

Conclusions: Due to ergonomic issues with dual-screen devices, augmented reality devices with the capacity to overlay images onto the surgical field will be key features of next-generation surgical head-up displays.

Keywords: Google Glass; augmented reality; endoscopy; head-up display; neuro; spine; surgery; wearable device.