Facilitators and barriers to non-medical prescribing - A systematic review and thematic synthesis
- PMID: 29709006
- PMCID: PMC5927440
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196471
Facilitators and barriers to non-medical prescribing - A systematic review and thematic synthesis
Abstract
Introduction: Non-medical prescribing has the potential to deliver innovative healthcare within limited finances. However, uptake has been slow, and a proportion of non-medical prescribers do not use the qualification. This systematic review aimed to describe the facilitators and barriers to non-medical prescribing in the United Kingdom.
Methods: The systematic review and thematic analysis included qualitative and mixed methods papers reporting facilitators and barriers to independent non-medical prescribing in the United Kingdom. The following databases were searched to identify relevant papers: AMED, ASSIA, BNI, CINAHL, EMBASE, ERIC, MEDLINE, Open Grey, Open access theses and dissertations, and Web of Science. Papers published between 2006 and March 2017 were included. Studies were quality assessed using a validated tool (QATSDD), then underwent thematic analysis. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42015019786).
Results: Of 3991 potentially relevant identified studies, 42 were eligible for inclusion. The studies were generally of moderate quality (83%), and most (71%) were published 2007-2012. The nursing profession dominated the studies (30/42). Thematic analysis identified three overarching themes: non-medical prescriber, human factors, and organisational aspects. Each theme consisted of several sub-themes; the four most highly mentioned were 'medical professionals', 'area of competence', 'impact on time' and 'service'. Sub-themes were frequently interdependent on each other, having the potential to act as a barrier or facilitator depending on circumstances.
Discussion: Addressing the identified themes and subthemes enables strategies to be developed to support and optimise non-medical prescribing. Further research is required to identify if similar themes are encountered by other non-medical prescribing groups than nurses and pharmacists.
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- NHS England. Five Year Forward View2014 October 2014. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/5yfv-web.pdf.
-
- NHS England. NHS England sets out proposals for more efficient and responsive access to medicines for patients 2015 [updated 26/02/15; cited 2015 12/13]. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/2015/02/26/access-to-medicines/.
-
- Next steps on the NHS five-year forward view. NHS England; 2017. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/2017/03/next-steps-on-the-five-year-forward-v.... - PubMed
-
- General Practice Forward View. NHS England; 2016. Available from: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/gpfv.pdf.
-
- Loughran I, Rae G. Physiotherapist prescribing in lower back pain: a case study. Nurse Prescribing. 2015;13(2):94–7. doi: 10.12968/npre.2015.13.2.94 - DOI