Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jun 13;376(2121):20170301.
doi: 10.1098/rsta.2017.0301.

Transmission of climate risks across sectors and borders

Affiliations
Review

Transmission of climate risks across sectors and borders

Andy J Challinor et al. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. .

Abstract

Systemic climate risks, which result from the potential for cascading impacts through inter-related systems, pose particular challenges to risk assessment, especially when risks are transmitted across sectors and international boundaries. Most impacts of climate variability and change affect regions and jurisdictions in complex ways, and techniques for assessing this transmission of risk are still somewhat limited. Here, we begin to define new approaches to risk assessment that can account for transboundary and trans-sector risk transmission, by presenting: (i) a typology of risk transmission that distinguishes clearly the role of climate versus the role of the social and economic systems that distribute resources; (ii) a review of existing modelling, qualitative and systems-based methods of assessing risk and risk transmission; and (iii) case studies that examine risk transmission in human displacement, food, water and energy security. The case studies show that policies and institutions can attenuate risks significantly through cooperation that can be mutually beneficial to all parties. We conclude with some suggestions for assessment of complex risk transmission mechanisms: use of expert judgement; interactive scenario building; global systems science and big data; innovative use of climate and integrated assessment models; and methods to understand societal responses to climate risk. These approaches aim to inform both research and national-level risk assessment.

Keywords: climate change; food security; migration; risk assessment; water resources.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Transboundary risk transmission mechanisms identified in the UK Climate Change Risk Assessment 2017 [7]. See also [8]. The left-hand side of the diagram depicts current risks; these are associated with climate variability (e.g. floods that disrupt supply chains). Longer-term gradual risks are shown on the right-hand side; these are the result of changes in both the mean and variability of climate (e.g. changes in crop suitability resulting from new climates). (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Pathways of resource- and climatically generated risk transmission. The former is characterized by amplification as a result of systemic risks and/or by perceptions of scarcity and risk (whether or not a real risk exists). Climatically generated risk transmission is characterized by climate-related events or processes that become more than the sum of their individual parts because of their systematic nature across time and/or space. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Resource-generated risk amplification through price transmission mechanisms in global agricultural commodity markets. Adapted from [12,18].

References

    1. Gardiner SM. 2011. A perfect moral storm: the ethical tragedy of climate change. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Challinor A, et al. 2016. International dimensions. In UK Climate Change Risk Assessment evidence report: ch. 7. Report prepared for the Adaptation Sub-Committee of the Committee on Climate Change, London, UK.
    1. Rayner S, Cantor R. 1987. How fair is safe enough? The cultural approach to societal technology choice. Risk Anal. 7, 3–9. (10.1111/j.1539-6924.1987.tb00963.x) - DOI
    1. Hughes TP, et al. 2017. Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nature 546, 82–90. (10.1038/nature22901) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ackerman F, DeCanio SJ, Howarth RB, Sheeran K. 2009. Limitations of integrated assessment models of climate change. Clim. Change 95, 297–315. (10.1007/s10584-009-9570-x) - DOI

LinkOut - more resources