Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2018 May 15;115(20):5057-5059.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805698115. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Adaptive and nonadaptive changes in phenological synchrony

Affiliations
Comment

Adaptive and nonadaptive changes in phenological synchrony

Andreas Lindén. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Changes in phenological synchrony, defined as the temporal delay in early or peak phases of occurrence, may have very different effects on consumer–resource systems depending on a number of other features of the full phenological distributions. In the illustrated examples, the original phenology of resource availability (green dashed line; peak at day 140) has advanced with 10 d (green solid line; peak at day 130), while the consumer demand has stayed unchanged (red solid line; peak at day 141). Assuming no benefits of resource surplus, the intersecting area of the resource and consumer curves (gray shaded area) divided with total consumer demand (area under red curve) is a parsimonious parameter for measuring phenological match (the percentage reported). In the classical scenario (A), where the resource availability and consumer demand are symmetric and narrow, phenological asynchrony strongly affects resource supply. In a wide and right-skewed distribution of resource availability, asynchrony has a much smaller effect (B), and changes in resource population abundance may be much more important (C). Food supply may show multiple peaks, for example corresponding to the phenology of several prey species (D), leading to a situation similar to that described in B.

Comment on

References

    1. Walther G-R, et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 2002;416:389–395. - PubMed
    1. Stenseth NC, et al. Ecological effects of climate fluctuations. Science. 2002;297:1292–1296. - PubMed
    1. Knudsen E, et al. Challenging claims in the study of migratory birds and climate change. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2011;86:928–946. - PubMed
    1. Durant JM, Hjermann DØ, Ottersen G, Stenseth NC. Climate and the match or mismatch between predator requirements and resource availability. Clim Res. 2007;33:271–283.
    1. Cushing DH. The regularity of the spawning season of some fishes. ICES J Mar Sci. 1969;33:81–92.

LinkOut - more resources