Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
- PMID: 29713204
- PMCID: PMC5912370
- DOI: 10.2147/IJWH.S153699
Efficacy and patient satisfaction after NovaSure and Minerva endometrial ablation for treating abnormal uterine bleeding: a retrospective comparative study
Abstract
Objective: Compare amenorrhea rate, menstrual symptoms, patient satisfaction, and adverse events in women who underwent endometrial ablation with the NovaSure versus the Minerva radiofrequency ablation systems.
Methods: We surveyed 189 premenopausal women (mean 40.8±6.2 years old) who underwent endometrial ablation for abnormal uterine bleeding using the NovaSure (n=97) or Minerva (n=92) systems, at four private US gynecology clinics, and whose procedure date was after July 2015 with follow-up ≥3 months. Women were surveyed an average of 11.3±3.9 months (range 137-532 days) after ablation.
Results: The subject-reported amenorrhea rate was 52% higher in NovaSure subjects than Minerva subjects (64% and 42%, respectively; p=0.004). Age and bleeding cyclicity did not affect amenorrhea rate in either group. Normal-to-no bleeding was reported by >90% of subjects after either treatment. NovaSure was significantly more effective than Minerva at reducing pad/tampon use in women with any residual bleeding (2.4±5.2 items/day versus 4.7±5.5 items/day, p=0.049). NovaSure was significantly more effective than Minerva at reducing premenstrual syndrome (PMS) symptoms (p=0.019) and menstrual pain (p=0.003), and more NovaSure subjects (94%) than Minerva subjects (78%) were satisfied with clinical outcomes (p=0.003). Adverse events did not differ by treatment; three women in each group progressed to hysterectomy.
Conclusion: While overall bleeding reduction in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding was excellent with either endometrial ablation system, NovaSure treatment resulted in a higher patient-reported 1-year amenorrhea rate, and women with residual bleeding used fewer pads and tampons than Minerva-treated women. Additionally, NovaSure subjects reported better menstrual-related life quality and PMS symptom alleviation, and greater satisfaction with outcomes than Minerva-treated women.
Keywords: Minerva; NovaSure; abnormal uterine bleeding; endometrial ablation; premeno-pausal; satisfaction.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure All authors were principal investigators in the current study and received compensation from Hologic for participation. Dr Scordalakes is a speaker for Shionogi & Co. Ltd., and a shareholder of The Women’s Hospital (Newburgh, IN). Dr delRosario is on the speakers’ bureau for Minerva Surgical, Inc. Dr Stankiewicz is a consultant for Ethicon and for Myriad Genetics. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Combined Bipolar Radiofrequency Impedance-Controlled Endometrial Ablation with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System versus Bipolar Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation Alone in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Mar-Apr;27(3):774-780. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.05.022. Epub 2019 Jun 12. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31201942
-
A double-blind randomized trial comparing the Cavaterm and the NovaSure endometrial ablation systems for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding.Fertil Steril. 2003 Jul;80(1):203-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(03)00549-1. Fertil Steril. 2003. PMID: 12849825 Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of the NovaSure endometrial ablation procedure in women with uterine cavity length over 10 cm.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014 Jun;36(6):491-497. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30562-4. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014. PMID: 24927186
-
Ten-year literature review of global endometrial ablation with the NovaSure® device.Int J Womens Health. 2014 Mar 11;6:269-80. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S56364. eCollection 2014. Int J Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 24648771 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endometrial ablation or resection versus levonorgestrel intra-uterine system for the treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding and a normal uterine cavity: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Hum Reprod Update. 2020 Feb 28;26(2):302-311. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmz051. Hum Reprod Update. 2020. PMID: 31990359
Cited by
-
Retrospective study on the outcomes and satisfaction with endometrial ablation by bipolar energy (NovaSure®) for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Feb;311(2):385-393. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07726-5. Epub 2024 Sep 13. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39269466 Free PMC article.
-
[The second generation endometrial ablation (NovaSure) improves efficacy of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in management of adenomyosis].Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019 Apr 25;48(2):136-141. doi: 10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2019.04.03. Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2019. PMID: 31309750 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Risk of Bias Assessment in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions for Premenstrual Syndrome: A Systematic Review.J Family Reprod Health. 2022 Jun;16(2):93-101. doi: 10.18502/jfrh.v16i2.9476. J Family Reprod Health. 2022. PMID: 36457654 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Committee on Practice Bulletins – Gynecology Practice bulletin no. 128: diagnosis of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(1):197–206. - PubMed
-
- Kuppermann M, Varner RE, Summitt RL, Jr, et al. Ms Research Group Effect of hysterectomy vs medical treatment on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning. JAMA. 2004;291(12):1447–1455. - PubMed
-
- Bradley LD, Gueye NA. The medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding in reproductive-aged women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(1):31–44. - PubMed
-
- Wallace SK, Fazzari MJ, Chen H, Cliby WA, Chalas E. Outcomes and postoperative complications after hysterectomies performed for benign compared with malignant indications. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(3):467–475. - PubMed
-
- Thakar R, Sultan AH. Hysterectomy and pelvic organ dysfunction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;19(3):403–418. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources