Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May-Jun;19(3):389-396.
doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.3.389. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Upper Abdominal Organs Acquired with Multiple B-Value Combinations: Value of Normalization Using Spleen as the Reference Organ

Bo Ram Kim  1 , Ji Soo Song  1   2   3 , Eun Jung Choi  1   2   3 , Seung Bae Hwang  1   2   3 , Hong Pil Hwang  4
Affiliations

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Upper Abdominal Organs Acquired with Multiple B-Value Combinations: Value of Normalization Using Spleen as the Reference Organ

Bo Ram Kim et al. Korean J Radiol. 2018 May-Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the upper abdominal organs acquired with multiple b-value combinations and to investigate usefulness of normalization.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data, including 3T diffusion-weighted images, of 100 patients (56 men, 44 women; mean age, 63.9) that underwent liver magnetic resonance imaging. An ADC map was derived with the following six b-value combinations: b1 = 0, 50, 400, 800; b2 = 0, 800; b3 = 0, 50, 800; b4 = 0, 400, 800; b5 = 50, 800; and b6 = 50, 400, 800 s/mm2. ADC values of the right liver lobe, left liver lobe, spleen, pancreas, right kidney, and left kidney were measured. ADC values of the spleen were used for normalization. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), comparison of dependent ICCs, and repeated-measures analysis of variance were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Intraclass correlation coefficients of the original ADC revealed moderate to substantial agreement (0.5145-0.6509), while normalized ADCs revealed almost perfect agreement (0.8014-0.8569). ICC of normalized ADC for all anatomical regions revealed significantly less variability than that of the original ADC (p < 0.05). Coefficient of variance for normalized ADC was significantly lower than that for the original ADC (3.0.3.8% vs. 4.8.8.8%, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Normalization of the ADC values of the upper abdominal organs using the spleen as the reference organ significantly decreased variability in ADC measurement acquired with multiple b-value combinations.

Keywords: Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Normalization; Normalized ADC; Spleen.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. ADC maps with six b-value combinations in 64-year-old man with hepatitis B cirrhosis.
Region of interests for ADC measurements of right and left liver lobe and spleen are indicated by white circles. A. b1 = 0, 50, 400, 800 s/mm2. B. b2 = 0, 800 s/mm2. C. b3 = 0, 50, 800 s/mm2. D. b4 = 0, 400, 800 s/mm2. E. b5 = 50, 800 s/mm2. F. b6 = 50, 400, 800 s/mm2. ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Soyer P, Kanematsu M, Taouli B, Koh DM, Manfredi R, Vilgrain V, et al. ADC normalization: a promising research track for diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the abdomen. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94:571–573. - PubMed
    1. Koh DM, Takahara T, Imai Y, Collins DJ. Practical aspects of assessing tumors using clinical diffusion-weighted imaging in the body. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2007;6:211–224. - PubMed
    1. Qayyum A. Diffusion-weighted imaging in the abdomen and pelvis: concepts and applications. Radiographics. 2009;29:1797–1810. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F. Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:1385–1393. - PubMed
    1. Afaq A, Andreou A, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for tumour response assessment: why, when and how? Cancer Imaging. 2010;10(Spec no A):S179–S188. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources