Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 23:46:13.
doi: 10.1186/s41182-018-0096-7. eCollection 2018.

Antimalarial drug prescribing by healthcare workers when malaria testing is negative: a qualitative study in Madagascar

Affiliations

Antimalarial drug prescribing by healthcare workers when malaria testing is negative: a qualitative study in Madagascar

David Harimbola Rakotonandrasana et al. Trop Med Health. .

Abstract

Background: Despite the World Health Organization and the National Malaria Program of Madagascar recommending that antimalarial drugs only be prescribed for patients with positive results on malaria rapid diagnostic tests, healthcare workers continue to prescribe these drugs for cases with negative test results. We explored why and how primary healthcare workers in Madagascar continue to prescribe antimalarial drugs despite this guidance.

Methods: We purposively selected 14 medical doctors and 2 nurses from 11 primary health facilities (6 public, 5 private) in Toliara, Madagascar, and interviewed them regarding their antimalarial prescribing behaviors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, focusing on why and how antimalarials were prescribed for clients with negative rapid diagnostic test results. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the responses were manually coded until consistent themes emerged.

Results: The narrative of healthcare workers regarding their continued prescribing of antimalarials despite negative test results revealed the following: (1) they prescribe antimalarials without positive test results due to their faith to give top priority to clients including the ethical value of beneficence, hope to maintain clinician's independence, and belief in drug effectiveness; (2) they use antimalarials despite negative test results due to the availability of alternative ways to procure antimalarials; and (3) they carefully select cases to prescribe and determine specific antimalarials despite negative test results by considering the client's physical condition, preference, and economic status. Our results indicate that healthcare workers prioritized clinician autonomy to give the best care they believed for each client they received, which led to conflict with policy administrators that urged clinicians to follow the national policy and guidelines. Moreover, healthcare workers had access to multiple sources of antimalarial drugs, and there was a lack of consistency in the program provisions that allowed alternative routes for prescribing outside of official policy.

Conclusions: We have shown how a national malarial treatment policy was translated into practice in Madagascar and have highlighted the barriers that may prevent policy success. We must attend to each of these barriers if we are to promote optimal use of antimalarial drugs.

Keywords: Antimalarials; Drug prescriptions; Guideline adherence; Health personnel; Health policy; Madagascar; Qualitative research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

This study protocol was approved by the Regional Representative of the Ministry of Health in Toliara, Madagascar, and by the Ethical Committee of Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Japan (No.1874; No. 2967). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.Our manuscript does not contain any personally identifiable information.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Reasons of antimalarial prescription when malaria testing is negative

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization. Universal access to malaria diagnostic testing: an operational manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
    1. World Health Organization. T3: Test. Treat. Track. Scaling up Diagnostic Testing, Treatment and Surveillance for Malaria. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
    1. World Health Organization. World malaria report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
    1. Whitty CJ, Chandler C, Ansah E, Leslie T, Staedke SG. Deployment of ACT antimalarials for treatment of malaria: challenges and opportunities. Malar J. 2008;7(Suppl 1):S7. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-7-S1-S7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bisoffi Z, Sirima BS, Angheben A, Lodesani C, Gobbi F, Tinto H, Van den Ende J. Rapid malaria diagnostic tests vs. clinical management of malaria in rural Burkina Faso: safety and effect on clinical decisions. A randomized trial. Tropical Med Int Health. 2009;14:491–498. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02246.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources