Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb:175:120-126.
doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.036. Epub 2017 Nov 24.

Accuracy and practicality of a portable ozone monitor for personal exposure estimates

Affiliations

Accuracy and practicality of a portable ozone monitor for personal exposure estimates

Jessica A Sagona et al. Atmos Environ (1994). 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Accurate measurements of personal exposure to atmospheric pollutants such as ozone are important for understanding health risks. We tested a new personal ozone monitor (POM; 2B Technologies) for accuracy, precision, and ease of use. The POM's measurements were compared to simultaneous ozone measurements from a 2B Model 205 monitor and a ThermoScientific 49i monitor, and multiple POMs were placed side-by-side to check precision. Tests were undertaken in a controlled environmental facility, outdoors, and in a private residence. Additionally, ten volunteers wore a POM for five days and answered a questionnaire about its ease of use. The POM measured ozone accurately compared to the 49i ozone monitor, with average relative differences of less than 8%. In the controlled environment tests, the POM's ozone measurements did not change in the presence of additional atmospheric constituents with similar absorption lines to ozone, though there may have been a small decrease in precision and accuracy. Precision between POMs varied by environment (r2 = 0.98 outdoors; r2 = 0.3 to 0.9 in controlled lab conditions). Volunteers reported that the POM was reasonably comfortable to wear, although all reported that they felt that it was too noisy. Overall, the POM is a viable option for personal ozone monitoring.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
One-minute average ozone measurements from POM 1 (x-axis) and POM 2 (y-axis) while ozone was generated in the CEF.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation of 5-minute average ozone concentrations from two POMs during 24-hour outdoor testing period with line of best fit.
Figure 3
Figure 3
One-minute average ozone concentrations [ppb] from POM 1 (x-axis) and POM 2 (y-axis) when both were worn indoors by a volunteer. During the third period, the volunteer cooked stir-fry.
Figure 4
Figure 4
One-minute average ozone measurements [ppb] in CEF. See text for explanation of adjusted POM values.
Figure 5
Figure 5
One-minute average ozone measurements [ppb] in CEF with TEX mixture present. See text for explanation of adjusted POM 2 values.
Figure 6
Figure 6
One-minute average ozone measurements [ppb] in CEF with aldehydes present. See text for explanation of adjusted POM 2 values.
Figure 7
Figure 7
One-minute average ozone concentration in the CEF with vanillin and anisole present.
Figure 8
Figure 8
One-minute average outdoor ozone measurements from 205 instrument (x-axis) and POM (y-axis).
Figure 9
Figure 9
One-minute average ozone concentrations during in-home testing. For the plotted points, the POM 2 was placed directly on top of the 205 monitor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andersen PC, Williford CJ, Birks JW. Miniature Personal Ozone Monitor Based on UV Absorbance. Analytical Chemistry. 2010;82:7924–7928. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bell ML. The use of ambient air quality modeling to estimate individual and population exposure for human health research: A case study of ozone in the Northern Georgia Region of the United States. Environ Int. 2006;32:586–593. - PubMed
    1. Bell ML, Zanobetti A, Dominici F. Who is more affected by ozone pollution? A systematic review and meta-analysis. American journal of epidemiology. 2014;180:15–28. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brauer M, Brook JR. Ozone personal exposures and health effects for selected groups residing in the Fraser Valley. Atmospheric Environment. 1997;31:2113–2121.
    1. Cao T, Thompson JE. Personal monitoring of ozone exposure: A fully portable device for under $150 USD cost. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 2016;224:936–943.

LinkOut - more resources