Is calcifediol better than cholecalciferol for vitamin D supplementation?
- PMID: 29713796
- DOI: 10.1007/s00198-018-4520-y
Is calcifediol better than cholecalciferol for vitamin D supplementation?
Abstract
Modest and even severe vitamin D deficiency is widely prevalent around the world. There is consensus that a good vitamin D status is necessary for bone and general health. Similarly, a better vitamin D status is essential for optimal efficacy of antiresorptive treatments. Supplementation of food with vitamin D or using vitamin D supplements is the most widely used strategy to improve the vitamin status. Cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) and ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) are the most widely used compounds and the relative use of both products depends on historical or practical reasons. Oral intake of calcifediol (25OHD3) rather than vitamin D itself should also be considered for oral supplementation. We reviewed all publications dealing with a comparison of oral cholecalciferol with oral calcifediol as to define the relative efficacy of both compounds for improving the vitamin D status. First, oral calcifediol results in a more rapid increase in serum 25OHD compared to oral cholecalciferol. Second, oral calcifediol is more potent than cholecalciferol, so that lower dosages are needed. Based on the results of nine RCTs comparing physiologic doses of oral cholecalciferol with oral calcifediol, calcifediol was 3.2-fold more potent than oral cholecalciferol. Indeed, when using dosages ≤ 25 μg/day, serum 25OHD increased by 1.5 ± 0.9 nmol/l for each 1 μg cholecalciferol, whereas this was 4.8 ± 1.2 nmol/l for oral calcifediol. Third, oral calcifediol has a higher rate of intestinal absorption and this may have important advantages in case of decreased intestinal absorption capacity due to a variety of diseases. A potential additional advantage of oral calcifediol is a linear dose-response curve, irrespective of baseline serum 25OHD, whereas the rise in serum 25OHD is lower after oral cholecalciferol, when baseline serum 25OHD is higher. Finally, intermittent intake of calcifediol results in fairly stable serum 25OHD compared with greater fluctuations after intermittent oral cholecalciferol.
Keywords: Absorption of vitamin D (metabolites); Calcifediol or 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 or 25OHD oral supplementation; Cholecalciferol or vitamin D3 oral supplementation; Conversion efficacy of vitamin D into 25OHD; Ergocalciferol or vitamin D2 oral supplementation; Metabolism of vitamin D; Vitamin D deficiency; Vitamin D supplementation.
Comment in
-
Calcifediol or vitamin D to optimize vitamin D status: Reply to letter of M Sosas.Osteoporos Int. 2019 Dec;30(12):2521-2522. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05164-7. Epub 2019 Oct 14. Osteoporos Int. 2019. PMID: 31612250 No abstract available.
-
Cholecalciferol and calcifediol for vitamin D supplementation.Osteoporos Int. 2020 Feb;31(2):391-392. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05163-8. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Osteoporos Int. 2020. PMID: 31673732 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Extended-Release Calcifediol Effectively Raises Serum Total 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Even in Overweight Nondialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism.Am J Nephrol. 2022;53(6):446-454. doi: 10.1159/000524289. Epub 2022 May 12. Am J Nephrol. 2022. PMID: 35551374 Free PMC article.
-
Cholecalciferol or Calcifediol in the Management of Vitamin D Deficiency.Nutrients. 2020 May 31;12(6):1617. doi: 10.3390/nu12061617. Nutrients. 2020. PMID: 32486496 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dose-response effects of supplementation with calcifediol on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status and its metabolites: A randomized controlled trial in older adults.Clin Nutr. 2018 Jun;37(3):808-814. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Mar 31. Clin Nutr. 2018. PMID: 28433267 Clinical Trial.
-
Vitamin D supplementation and COVID-19 risk: a population-based, cohort study.J Endocrinol Invest. 2022 Jan;45(1):167-179. doi: 10.1007/s40618-021-01639-9. Epub 2021 Jul 17. J Endocrinol Invest. 2022. PMID: 34273098 Free PMC article.
-
25(OH)D3-enriched or fortified foods are more efficient at tackling inadequate vitamin D status than vitamin D3.Proc Nutr Soc. 2018 Aug;77(3):282-291. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117004062. Epub 2017 Nov 27. Proc Nutr Soc. 2018. PMID: 29173203 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
25-OHD response to vitamin D supplementation in children: effect of dose but not GC haplotype.Eur J Endocrinol. 2021 Jul 7;185(2):333-342. doi: 10.1530/EJE-21-0349. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021. PMID: 34128826 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Vitamin D supplementation in a post-pandemic era: A narrative review.S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2023 Oct 17;65(1):e1-e6. doi: 10.4102/safp.v65i1.5752. S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2023. PMID: 37916701 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Scientific opinion on the tolerable upper intake level for vitamin D, including the derivation of a conversion factor for calcidiol monohydrate.EFSA J. 2023 Aug 8;21(8):e08145. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8145. eCollection 2023 Aug. EFSA J. 2023. PMID: 37560437 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Weekly Supplementation of Cholecalciferol and Calcifediol Among the Oldest-Old People: Findings From a Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial.Nutrients. 2019 Nov 15;11(11):2778. doi: 10.3390/nu11112778. Nutrients. 2019. PMID: 31731651 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Cholecalciferol and calcifediol for vitamin D supplementation.Osteoporos Int. 2020 Feb;31(2):391-392. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05163-8. Epub 2019 Oct 31. Osteoporos Int. 2020. PMID: 31673732 No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical