Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 1;13(5):e0196596.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196596. eCollection 2018.

Real life management of patients hospitalized with multiple myeloma in France

Affiliations

Real life management of patients hospitalized with multiple myeloma in France

Charles Dumontet et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Patients with multiple myeloma included in prospective clinical trials are highly selected and therefore are expected not to be representative of the entire patient population. Additionally recommendations based on literature data and randomized trials are not systematically implemented in all patients. We sought to determine how patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma are currently treated in France.

Methods and findings: We performed a nation-wide search using the Programme de Médicalisation des Systèmes d'Information (PMSI) database which includes anonymous data for all patients hospitalized in France. We identified newly diagnosed cases in 2012 and analyzed the number and duration of hospital stays, coexisting conditions and treatment modalities with data available until the end of 2015. A diagnosis of multiple myeloma was determined for the first time during a hospitalization in France in 2012 in 6,282 patients (3,234 males and 3,048 females). The median age at diagnosis was 74 years (72 in males and 76 in females). A majority (55.3%) of patients were diagnosed and treated in a single heath center, including 37% in a university hospital and 52% in a non-university public hospital. Comorbidities potentially impacting on myeloma treatment were present in 57.5% of patients at diagnosis, and 15% had an associated diagnosis of another neoplasia. Intensive therapies with stem cell transplants were performed in 1033 patients (16% of total), the majority of which were aged less than 65 (881 patients, 85.3%). Stem cell transplants were performed more frequently in males while the distance between the site of residence and the transplant center had no impact on likelihood of receiving a transplant. Only 60% of patients less than 65 years old who were treated for their disease underwent intensification with stem cell transplant within the 4-year follow-up period.

Conclusions: A large majority of patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of multiple myeloma are elderly, in particular females, and not eligible for transplants. Among the patients aged less than 65 and receiving therapy for their disease, 40% do not undergo transplants. These data emphasize the need for alternative therapies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Age distribution by sex of patients newly diagnosed with multiple myeloma during a hospital stay in France in 2012.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Geographical distribution of stem cell transplants in France in patients newly diagnosed with myeloma in 2012.
Fig 2A. Geographical distribution of stem cell transplants performed in patients less than 65 years old at diagnosis during their follow-up. Stem cell transplants were performed in 39 administrative areas or “Départements”. Fig 2B. Probability of proceeding to a stem cell transplant according to place of residence in patients less than 65 years old and having received therapy in the hospital for their disease.

References

    1. Velez R, Turesson I, Landgren O, Kristinsson SY, Cuzick J. Incidence of multiple myeloma in Great Britain, Sweden, and Malmo, Sweden: the impact of differences in case ascertainment on observed incidence trends. BMJ Open 2016;6(1):e009584 doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009584 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turesson I, Velez R, Kristinsson SY, Landgren O. Patterns of multiple myeloma during the past 5 decades: stable incidence rates for all age groups in the population but rapidly changing age distribution in the clinic. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85(3):225–30. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0426 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mateos MV, Ocio EM, Paiva B, Rosinol L, Martinez-Lopez J, Blade J, et al. Treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in 2015. Blood Rev 2015;29(6):387–403. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2015.06.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Touzeau C, Moreau P, Dumontet C. Monoclonal antibody therapy in multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2017;31(5):1039–1047. doi: 10.1038/leu.2017.60 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quach H, Horvath N, Cannell P, Mikhael JR, Butcher BE, Prince HM. Safety and efficacy results from an international expanded access programme to bortezomib for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: a subset analysis of the Australian and New Zealand data of 111 patients. Intern Med J 2009;39(5):290–5. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01738.x - DOI - PubMed