Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 1;20(5):e10235.
doi: 10.2196/10235.

Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature

Conceição Granja  1 , Wouter Janssen  2 , Monika Alise Johansen  1   2
Affiliations

Factors Determining the Success and Failure of eHealth Interventions: Systematic Review of the Literature

Conceição Granja et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: eHealth has an enormous potential to improve healthcare cost, effectiveness, and quality of care. However, there seems to be a gap between the foreseen benefits of research and clinical reality.

Objective: Our objective was to systematically review the factors influencing the outcome of eHealth interventions in terms of success and failure.

Methods: We searched the PubMed database for original peer-reviewed studies on implemented eHealth tools that reported on the factors for the success or failure, or both, of the intervention. We conducted the systematic review by following the patient, intervention, comparison, and outcome framework, with 2 of the authors independently reviewing the abstract and full text of the articles. We collected data using standardized forms that reflected the categorization model used in the qualitative analysis of the outcomes reported in the included articles.

Results: Among the 903 identified articles, a total of 221 studies complied with the inclusion criteria. The studies were heterogeneous by country, type of eHealth intervention, method of implementation, and reporting perspectives. The article frequency analysis did not show a significant discrepancy between the number of reports on failure (392/844, 46.5%) and on success (452/844, 53.6%). The qualitative analysis identified 27 categories that represented the factors for success or failure of eHealth interventions. A quantitative analysis of the results revealed the category quality of healthcare (n=55) as the most mentioned as contributing to the success of eHealth interventions, and the category costs (n=42) as the most mentioned as contributing to failure. For the category with the highest unique article frequency, workflow (n=51), we conducted a full-text review. The analysis of the 23 articles that met the inclusion criteria identified 6 barriers related to workflow: workload (n=12), role definition (n=7), undermining of face-to-face communication (n=6), workflow disruption (n=6), alignment with clinical processes (n=2), and staff turnover (n=1).

Conclusions: The reviewed literature suggested that, to increase the likelihood of success of eHealth interventions, future research must ensure a positive impact in the quality of care, with particular attention given to improved diagnosis, clinical management, and patient-centered care. There is a critical need to perform in-depth studies of the workflow(s) that the intervention will support and to perceive the clinical processes involved.

Keywords: eHealth; failure; medical informatics; success; systematic review; telemedicine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart of the literature search and article selection.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization . User's guide: the WHO global code of practice on the international recruitment of health personnel. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011. Jan, [2018-02-12]. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/70525/WHO_HSS_HRH_HMR_20... .
    1. Parker MG, Thorslund M. Health trends in the elderly population: getting better and getting worse. Gerontologist. 2007 Apr;47(2):150–8.47/2/150 - PubMed
    1. Ward BW, Schiller JS. Prevalence of multiple chronic conditions among US adults: estimates from the National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Apr 25;10:E65. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120203. https://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2013/12_0203.htm E65 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. Lancet. 2009 Oct 3;374(9696):1196–208. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61460-4. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19801098 S0140-6736(09)61460-4 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ågren G, Berensson K. Healthy Ageing -- A Challenge for Europe. Stockholm, Sweden: The Swedish National Institute of Public Health; 2006.

Publication types