Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 9;73(8):1119-1124.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly099.

Patterns and Perceived Benefits of Utilizing Seven Major Complementary Health Approaches in U.S. Older Adults

Taeho Greg Rhee  1   2 , Richard A Marottoli  1   3 , Peter H Van Ness  1 , Mary E Tinetti  1   3
Affiliations

Patterns and Perceived Benefits of Utilizing Seven Major Complementary Health Approaches in U.S. Older Adults

Taeho Greg Rhee et al. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. .

Abstract

Objectives: To examine patterns and perceived benefits of seven major complementary health approaches (CHA) among older adults in the United States.

Methods: Data from the 2012 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), which represents non-institutionalized adults aged 65 or older (n = 7,116 unweighted), were used. We elicited seven most common CHA used in older adults, which are acupuncture, herbal therapies, chiropractic, massage, meditation, Tai Chi, and yoga. Survey participants were asked to self-report perceived benefits (eg, maintaining health and stress reduction) in their CHA used. We estimated prevalence and perceived benefits of CHA use. We also investigated socio-demographic and clinical factors associated with the use of any of these seven CHA.

Results: Overall, 29.2% of older adults used any of seven CHA in the past year. Most commonly used CHA included herbal therapies (18.1%), chiropractic (8.4%), and massage (5.7%). More than 60% of older CHA users reported that CHA were important for maintaining health and well-being. Other perceived benefits included improving overall health and feeling better (52.3%), giving a better sense of control over health (27.4%), and making it easier to cope with health problems (24.7%). Older adults with higher education and income levels, ≥2 chronic conditions, and functional limitations had greater odds of using CHA (p < .01, respectively).

Conclusion: A substantial number of older CHA users reported CHA-related benefits. CHA may play a crucial role in improving health status among older adults. At the population level, further research on the effects of CHA use on bio-psycho-social outcomes is needed to promote healthy aging in older adults.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Self-reported perceived benefits of using any of major seven complementary health approaches (CHA) among older CHA users (n = 2,127 unweighted), 2012 NHIS. Note: Bars represent 95% confidence intervals.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. The use of complementary and alternative medicine in the United States 2016. https://nccih.nih.gov/research/statistics/2007/camsurvey_fs1.htm. Accessed July 27, 2017.
    1. Johnson PJ, Jou J, Rhee TG, Rockwood TH, Upchurch DM. Complementary health approaches for health and wellness in midlife and older US adults. Maturitas. 2016;89:36–42. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.04.012 - PubMed
    1. Clarke TC, Black LI, Stussman BJ, Barnes PM, Nahin RL. Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002–2012. Natl Health Stat Report. 2015;79:1–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanchette MA, Stochkendahl MJ, Borges Da Silva R, Boruff J, Harrison P, Bussières A. Effectiveness and economic evaluation of chiropractic care for the treatment of low back pain: a systematic review of pragmatic studies. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0160037. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160037 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al. . Nonpharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166:493–505. doi:10.7326/M16-2459 - PubMed

Publication types