Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement
- PMID: 29718565
- PMCID: PMC6117205
- DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14907
Kidney offer acceptance at programs undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement
Abstract
In the United States, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) use Systems Improvement Agreements (SIAs) to require transplant programs repeatedly flagged for poor-performance to improve performance or lose CMS funding for transplants. We identified 14 kidney transplant (KT) programs with SIAs and 28 KT programs without SIAs matched on waitlist volume and characterized kidney acceptance using SRTR data from 12/2006-3/2015. We used difference-in-differences linear regression models to identify changes in acceptance associated with an SIA independent of program variation and trends prior to the SIA. SIA programs accepted 26.9% and 22.1% of offers pre- and post-SIA, while non-SIA programs accepted 33.9% and 44.4% of offers in matched time periods. After adjustment for donor characteristics, time-varying waitlist volume, and secular trends, SIAs were associated with a 5.9 percentage-point (22%) decrease in kidney acceptance (95% CI: -10.9 to -0.8, P = .03). The decrease in acceptance post-SIA was more pronounced for KDPI 0-40 kidneys (12.3 percentage-point decrease, P = .007); reductions in acceptance of higher KDPI kidneys occurred pre-SIA. Programs undergoing SIAs substantially reduced acceptance of kidney offers for waitlisted candidates. Attempts to improve posttransplant outcomes might have the unintended consequence of reducing access to transplantation as programs adopt more restrictive organ selection practices.
Keywords: Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN); Scientific Registry for Transplant Recipients (SRTR); clinical decision-making; clinical research/practice; ethics and public policy; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ acceptance; organ procurement and allocation.
© 2018 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the
Figures


Comment in
-
Rethinking performance benchmarks in kidney transplantation.Am J Transplant. 2018 Sep;18(9):2109-2110. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14947. Epub 2018 Jun 12. Am J Transplant. 2018. PMID: 29791069 No abstract available.
-
Another piece of the antibody puzzle: Observations from the HALT study.Am J Transplant. 2018 Sep;18(9):2111-2112. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14959. Epub 2018 Jun 15. Am J Transplant. 2018. PMID: 29862642 No abstract available.
-
Re: Kidney Offer Acceptance at Programs Undergoing a Systems Improvement Agreement.J Urol. 2019 Apr;201(4):656. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000082. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30947444 No abstract available.
References
-
- Centers for M, Medicaid Services HHS. Medicare program; hospital conditions of participation: requirements for approval and re-approval of transplant centers to perform organ transplants. Final rule. Fed Regist. 2007 Mar 30;72(61):15197–280. - PubMed
-
- Schold JD, Buccini LD, Poggio ED, Flechner SM, Goldfarb DA. Association of Candidate Removals From the Kidney Transplant Waiting List and Center Performance Oversight. Am J Transplant. 2016 Apr;16(4):1276–84. - PubMed
-
- Schold JD, Buccini LD, Srinivas TR, Srinivas RT, Poggio ED, Flechner SM, et al. The association of center performance evaluations and kidney transplant volume in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2013 Jan;13(1):67–75. - PubMed
-
- Heilman RL, Green EP, Reddy KS, Moss A, Kaplan B. Potential Impact of Risk and Loss Aversion on the Process of Accepting Kidneys for Transplantation. Transplantation. 2017 Jul;101(7):1514–7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources