Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr-Jun;13(2):153-157.
doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_218_16.

Contrast Sensitivity Abnormalities in Deaf Individuals

Affiliations

Contrast Sensitivity Abnormalities in Deaf Individuals

Masoud Khorrami-Nejad et al. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2018 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: Hearing impaired children are heavily dependent on their sense of vision to develop efficient communication skills; any contrast sensitivity defect can negatively impact their lives because they are not able to use auditory stimuli to recognize probable dangers in the world around them. The purpose of this study was to determine the contrast sensitivity abnormalities in deaf individuals.

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, contrast sensitivity of 15- to 20-year-old high-school boys with hearing disability from Tehran, Iran were evaluated. Sixty-four eyes were tested for contrast sensitivity and refractive error. All subjects had an intelligence quotient (IQ) >70. We investigated their contrast sensitivity with Vector vision CVS-1000 in 4 different spatial frequencies.

Results: Profound hearing loss was noted in 50% of the subjects. The frequency of contrast sensitivity abnormalities in 4 different spatial frequencies varied between 51.6% and 65.6%. The largest abnormalities were recorded at 18 cycles per degree. Only 12.5% of deaf students had corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) greater than zero (in LogMAR). The abnormalities in contrast sensitivity showed no correlation with the type or severity of hearing loss.

Conclusion: Hearing impaired boys are at a greater risk for contrast sensitivity abnormalities than boys with normal hearing. The larger frequency of contrast sensitivity abnormalities in high spatial frequencies than in other frequencies may demonstrate greater defects in the central visual system compared with the periphery in individuals with hearing loss.

Keywords: Contrast Sensitivity; Deafness; Hearing Loss; Refractive Error.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Nelson HD, Bougatsos C, Nygren P. 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force. Universal newborn hearing screening: Systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics. 2008;122:e266–276. - PubMed
    1. Thompson DC, McPhillips H, Davis RL, Lieu TA, Homer CJ, Helfand M. Universal newborn hearing screening: Summary of evidence. JAMA. 2001;286:2000–2010. - PubMed
    1. Ries PW. Prevalence and characteristics of persons with hearing trouble: United States, 1990-91. Vital Health Stat. 1994;188:1–75. - PubMed
    1. Horn DL, Davisa RA, Pisoni DB, Miyamoto RT. Visual attention, behavioral inhibition and speech/language outcomes in deaf children with cochlear implants. Int Congr Ser. 2004;1273:332–335. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khorrami-Nejad M, Heravian J, Sedaghat MR, Momeni-Moghadam H, Sobhani-Rad D, Askarizadeh F. Visual field abnormalities among adolescent boys with hearing impairments. Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol. 2016;5:63. - PMC - PubMed