Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 2;18(1):123.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-018-1751-z.

The effect of implementation strength of basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) on facility deliveries and the met need for BEmONC at the primary health care level in Ethiopia

Affiliations

The effect of implementation strength of basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) on facility deliveries and the met need for BEmONC at the primary health care level in Ethiopia

Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC) is a primary health care level initiative promoted in low- and middle-income countries to reduce maternal and newborn mortality. Tailored support, including BEmONC training to providers, mentoring and monitoring through supportive supervision, provision of equipment and supplies, strengthening referral linkages, and improving infection-prevention practice, was provided in a package of interventions to 134 health centers, covering 91 rural districts of Ethiopia to ensure timely BEmONC care. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in measuring program implementation strength to evaluate public health gains. To assess the effectiveness of the BEmONC initiative, this study measures its implementation strength and examines the effect of its variability across intervention health centers on the rate of facility deliveries and the met need for BEmONC.

Methods: Before and after data from 134 intervention health centers were collected in April 2013 and July 2015. A BEmONC implementation strength index was constructed from seven input and five process indicators measured through observation, record review, and provider interview; while facility delivery rate and the met need for expected obstetric complications were measured from service statistics and patient records. We estimated the dose-response relationships between outcome and explanatory variables of interest using regression methods.

Results: The BEmONC implementation strength index score, which ranged between zero and 10, increased statistically significantly from 4.3 at baseline to 6.7 at follow-up (p < .05). Correspondingly, the health center delivery rate significantly increased from 24% to 56% (p < .05). There was a dose-response relationship between the explanatory and outcome variables. For every unit increase in BEmONC implementation strength score there was a corresponding average of 4.5 percentage points (95% confidence interval: 2.1-6.9) increase in facility-based deliveries; while a higher score for BEmONC implementation strength of a health facility at follow-up was associated with a higher met need.

Conclusion: The BEmONC initiative was effective in improving institutional deliveries and may have also improved the met need for BEmONC services. The BEmONC implementation strength index can be potentially used to monitor the implementation of BEmONC interventions.

Keywords: Basic emergency obstetric and newborn care (BEmONC); Emergency obstetric care (EmONC); Ethiopia; Implementation strength; Life-saving interventions; Low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); Maternal and newborn health; Primary health care; Rural health centers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical review committees of the Amhara, Oromia, SNNP, and Tigray regional health bureaus granted ethical clearance. The study participants (i.e., heads of the health centers and health care providers working in the maternity units) were informed about the purpose of the study and their right to opt-out or not to respond to questions. The study subjects provided informed verbal consent prior to any interview. The interviewer electronically marked the questionnaire as consent given if both the respondents agreed to be interviewed upon listening to the consent statement and then continued with the interview only after receiving and documenting the consent. The survey protocol submitted to the regional health bureaus ethical review committee included the study questionnaire and the consent statement with descriptions of the consent obtaining procedure which was approved by the committee. The name of the respondent was not recorded by the interviewer. Moreover, data collection did not interfere with their normal work with clients. The values, rights, and norms of the study subjects, enumerators and supervisors were respected.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Conceptual framework: BIS components to improve critical care service utilization at primary facilities
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Distribution of expected deliveries at the health centers by study period
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Association between change in health center delivery rates and change in BIS score
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Cross-sectional association between the met need for BEmONC at health centers and BIS score

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nour NM. An introduction to maternal mortality. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2008;1(2):77–81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P, et al. Every newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet (London, England) 2014;384(9938):189–205. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60496-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paxton A, Maine D, Freedman L, Fry D, Lobis S. The evidence for emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2005;88(2):181–193. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.11.026. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lawn JE, Kerber K, Enweronu-Laryea C, Cousens S. 3.6 million neonatal deaths--what is progressing and what is not? Semin Perinatol. 2010;34(6):371–386. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2010.09.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. The Partnership for Maternal Newborn & Child Health . A global review of the key interventions related to Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (RMNCH) Geneva: PMNCH; 2011.

MeSH terms