Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 16:62.
doi: 10.29219/fnr.v62.1362. eCollection 2018.

National nutrition surveys in Europe: a review on the current status in the 53 countries of the WHO European region

Affiliations

National nutrition surveys in Europe: a review on the current status in the 53 countries of the WHO European region

Holly L Rippin et al. Food Nutr Res. .

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the coverage of national nutrition surveys in the 53 countries monitored by the World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Office for Europe and identify gaps in provision, (2) to describe relevant survey attributes and (3) to check whether energy and nutrients are reported with a view to providing information for evidence-based nutrition policy planning.

Design: Dietary survey information was gathered using three methods: (1) direct email to survey authors and other relevant contacts, (2) systematic review of literature databases and (3) general web-based searches. Survey characteristics relating to time frame, sampling and dietary methodology and nutrients reported were tabled from all relevant surveys found since 1990.

Setting: Fifty-three countries of the WHO Regional Office for Europe, which have need for an overview of dietary surveys across the life course.

Subjects: European individuals (adults and children) in national diet surveys.

Results: A total of 109 nationally representative dietary surveys undertaken post-1990 were found across 34 countries. Of these, 78 surveys from 33 countries were found post-2000, and of these, 48 surveys from 27 countries included children and 60 surveys from 30 countries included adults. No nationally representative surveys were found for 19 of 53 countries, mainly from Central and Eastern Europe. Multiple 24hr recall and food diaries were the most common dietary assessment methods. Only 22 countries reported energy and nutrient intakes from post-2000 surveys; macronutrients were more widely reported than micronutrients.

Conclusions: Less than two-thirds of WHO Europe countries have nationally representative diet surveys, mainly collected post-2000. The main availability gaps lie in Central and Eastern European countries, where nutrition policies may therefore lack an appropriate evidence base. Dietary methodological differences may limit the scope for inter-country comparisons.

Keywords: WHO European region; dietary assessment methodologies; multi-criteria analysis; national diet surveys; nutritional epidemiology; scoping review – gaps.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Screening and selection of national dietary surveys.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Map of national dietary survey provision by country. Light grey – Post-2000 survey plus nutrient intakes (28 surveys in 22 countries). Medium grey – Post-2000 survey (78 surveys in 33 countries). Medium-dark grey – Pre-2000 survey (3 surveys in 1 country). Dark grey – No survey (19 countries). White – countries not in the WHO Europe remit.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Number of macronutrients reported by each national dietary survey by country*: *Where 12 is the maximum potential number of selected macronutrients of interest being reported in NDS reports: energy, protein, carbohydrate, sugars, sucrose, starches, fibre, total fat, saturated fat, monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and trans-fatty acids (TFA).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Number of micronutrients reported by each national dietary survey by country*: *Where 19 is the maximum potential number of selected micronutrients of interest being reported in NDS reports: folate (B9), niacin (B3), vitamin A, riboflavin (B2), thiamine (B1), vitamin B12 (biotin), vitamin B6 (pyridoxine), vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, calcium, magnesium, potassium, sodium, iron, copper, iodine, selenium and zinc.

References

    1. WHO (2014). European food and nutrition action plan 2015–2020. WHO Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen.
    1. Alwan A. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. World Health Organization; Copenhagen, 2011.
    1. Mozaffarian D, Wilson PW, Kannel WB. Beyond established and novel risk factors lifestyle risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2008; 117(23): 3031–8. - PubMed
    1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. . A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990–2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013; 380(9859): 2224–60. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Micha R, Khatibzadeh S, Shi P, Fahimi S, Lim S, Andrews KG, et al. . Global, regional, and national consumption levels of dietary fats and oils in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis including 266 country-specific nutrition surveys. BMJ 2014; 348: g2272. - PMC - PubMed