Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 6;9(8):1421-1429.
doi: 10.7150/jca.23583. eCollection 2018.

Survival Outcomes for Patients with Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatments in Stages I-III Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Affiliations

Survival Outcomes for Patients with Surgical and Non-Surgical Treatments in Stages I-III Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Keying Che et al. J Cancer. .

Abstract

Objectives: Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are the standard treatments for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, recent studies suggest that patients with limited stage (I-III) SCLC may benefit from surgical treatment. This study was performed to evaluate the survival outcomes of surgery for stage I-III SCLC. Methods: This analysis used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. All stage I-III (excluding N3 and Nx) SCLC patients received a diagnosis between 2004 and 2014. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. A Cox proportional hazard model identified relevant survival variables. Results: A total of 4,780 histologically confirmed patients were identified from the SEER database, comprising 1,018 patients (21.3%) with stage I disease; 295 (6.2%) with stage II; and 3,467 (72.5%) with stage III disease. Among all of the patients, 520 had been treated with surgery, the majority (n = 344; 66.2%) of whom had stage I disease. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS and LCSS, in patients who underwent surgery, according to stage were as follows: OS, 0.369 and LCSS, 0.335 in stage I; OS, 0.549 and LCSS, 0.506 in stage II; and OS, 0.477 and LCSS, 0.456 in stage III (all p < 0.001). Patients who underwent surgery had significantly better OS, and lobectomy was associated with the best outcome. Conclusions: Surgical resection was associated with significantly improved OS outcomes and should be considered in the management of stage I-III SCLC.

Keywords: SEER; Small-cell lung cancer; lobectomy; postoperative radiation therapy; surgical resection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for OS and LCSS based on surgery or no-surgery at stage I-III and each stage of SCLC.
Fig 1
Fig 1
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for OS and LCSS based on surgery or no-surgery at stage I-III and each stage of SCLC.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for OS and LCSS based on surgery type.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for OS and LCSS to assess the impact of surgery alone or PORT for stage I-III SCLC.

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2016;66:7–30. - PubMed
    1. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Jemal A. Lung Cancer Statistics. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 2016;893:1–19. - PubMed
    1. Conen K, Hagmann R, Hess V, Zippelius A, Rothschild SI. Incidence and predictors of Bone Metastases (BM) and Skeletal-Related Events (SREs) in Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC): A Swiss patient cohort. Journal of Cancer. 2016;7:2110–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mountain CF. The international system for staging lung cancer. Seminars in surgical oncology. 2000;18:106–15. - PubMed
    1. Ganti AK, Zhen W, Kessinger A. Limited-stage small-cell lung cancer: therapeutic options. Oncology (Williston Park, NY) 2007;21:303–12. discussion 12, 15-8, 23. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources