Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 16;7(4):510-519.
doi: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.4.510. eCollection 2017 Oct-Dec.

Finite element comparison between the human and the ovine lumbar intervertebral disc

Affiliations

Finite element comparison between the human and the ovine lumbar intervertebral disc

Gloria Casaroli et al. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. .

Abstract

Introduction: Nowadays it is still not clear which loading conditions are responsible for lumbar intervertebral disc failure. Many studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of different loading conditions on the herniation processes, and many of them were based on the ovine model. However, the biomechanical similarities between the human and the ovine lumbar disc have been demonstrated in the main planes only, whereas it is not known if they are comparable under complex loading conditions too. The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical response of the ovine and the human lumbar intervetebral disc under complex loading conditions, in order to investigate differences and similarities between the species.The loading scenarios described in a finite element study on a human lumbar segment were applied to a model of the ovine disc, and the results were then compared.It has been shown that combined loads generated highest strains in both the models, and the maximum strains had the same location in the posterior or in the postero-lateral region of the annulus, according to the loading scenario.

Conclusion: The ovine disc can be used in spinal research to investigate herniation process under any loading conditions.

Level of evidence: V.

Keywords: animal model; anisotropic hyperelastic; finite element analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic representation of the reference systems used for the different loading scenarios. For the combination of (a) flexion - extension (FL-EX) and lateral bending (LB), the x and the y axes were incrementally rotated by an α angle of 15 degrees around the z axis; for the combination of (b) FL-EX and axial rotation (AR), the x and the z axes were incrementally rotated by 15 degrees around the y axis; for the combination of (c) AR and LB, the y and the z axes were incrementally rotated by 15 degrees around the x axis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Resulting rotations generated by the combination of (a) flexion-extension (FL-EX) and lateral bending (LB), (b) FLEX and axial rotation (AR), (c) AR and LB.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison between the ovine and the human maximum Intradiscal Pressure values under all the applied loading scenarios (adapted from Schmidt et al.9). FL means flexion, EX means extension, LB means lateral bending and AR means axial rotation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison between the ovine maximum circumferential strain of the annulus fibrous and the human maximum fiber strains under all the applied loading scenarios (adapted from Schmidt et al.9). FL means flexion, EX means extension, LB means lateral bending and AR means axial rotation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Location of the maximum circumferential strain in the ovine finite element model. The red line includes the area indicated by Schmidt as characterized by the most strained fibers in the human healthy disc. FL means flexion, EX means extension, LB means lateral bending and AR means axial rotation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Comparison between the ovine and the human maximum shear strain at the interface between the annulus and the endplate under all the applied loading scenarios (adapted from Schmidt et al.9). FL means flexion, EX means extension, LB means lateral bending and AR means axial rotation.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Location of the maximum shear strain in the ovine finite element model. The red line includes the area indicated by Schmidt9 as characterized by highest shear strain in the human healthy disc. FL means flexion, EX means extension, LB means lateral bending and AR means axial rotation.

References

    1. Veres SP, Robertson PA, Broom ND. The morphology of acute disc herniation: a clinically relevant model defining the role of flexion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). United States. 2009 Oct;34(21):2288–2296. - PubMed
    1. Veres SP, Robertson PA, Broom ND. ISSLS prize winner: microstructure and mechanical disruption of the lumbar disc annulus: part II: how the annulus fails under hydrostatic pressure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008 Dec 1;33(25):2711–2720. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19002077. - PubMed
    1. Veres SP, Robertson PA, Broom ND. The influence of torsion on disc herniation when combined with flexion. Eur Spine J. 2010 Sep;19(9):1468–1478. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2989279&tool=p.... - PMC - PubMed
    1. Osti OL, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser RD. Anulus Tears and Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. An experimental Study Using an Animal Model. Spine. 1990:762–767. - PubMed
    1. Wilke H-J, Kettler A, Claes L. Are Sheep Spines a Valid Biomechanical Model for Human Spines? 1997. pp. 2365–2374. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9355217. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources