Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2018 Jun 1;22(2):113-115.
doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20180036.

Can trophectoderm morphology act as a predictor for euploidy?

Affiliations
Observational Study

Can trophectoderm morphology act as a predictor for euploidy?

Ivan H Yoshida et al. JBRA Assist Reprod. .

Abstract

Objective: Euploid embryo transfers yield better implantation rates. In Brazil, morphological evaluation is performed to select the best embryos, since genetic analysis is still an expensive procedure. This study aimed to evaluate whether there is an association between trophectoderm morphology and ploidy status.

Methods: The study included 113 blastocysts formed in D5/D6 from 58 in vitro fertilization cycles held from January/2016 to May/2017. All patients with indication for PGD/PGS were included in the study. The mean age of the female patients was 37.04±5.65years. Biopsied blastocysts were categorized for morphology. Cells were sent for genetic analysis using the CGH array, SNP array or NGS techniques. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi square test, and statistical significance was assigned to differences with p≤0.05.

Results: Chromosome analysis revealed that 44 (38.9%) blastocysts were euploid. Blastocysts with trophectoderm grades A, B, and C had euploidy rates of 71.43%, 60% and 19.67%, respectively (p≤0.05).

Conclusion: Although the best trophectoderm morphology grades had higher euploidy rates, this indicator alone is not enough to warrant embryo genetic viability.

Keywords: Chromosome; aneuploidy; blastocyst; preimplantation genetic screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

The authors have no conflict of interests to report.

References

    1. Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Colls P, Stevens J, Gutiérrez-Mateo C, Schoolcraft WB, Katz-Jaffe MG, Wells D. The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:520–524. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine Frequently asked questions about infertility. 2017. Available at: http://www.reproductivefacts.org/faqs/frequently-asked-questions-about-i...
    1. Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliot T, Wright G, Nagy ZP, Ubaldi FM. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1173–1181. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ebner T, Moser M, Sommergruber M, Tews G. Selection based on morphological assessment of oocytes and embryos at different stages of preimplantation development: a review. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:251–262. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmg021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Wells D. Morphological and cytogenetic assessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20:117–126. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat073. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources