Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 3;18(1):94.
doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1210-6.

Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review

M Arantes  1   2 , J Arantes  3 , M A Ferreira  4
Affiliations

Tools and resources for neuroanatomy education: a systematic review

M Arantes et al. BMC Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of this review was to identify studies exploring neuroanatomy teaching tools and their impact in learning, as a basis towards the implementation of a neuroanatomy program in the context of a curricular reform in medical education.

Methods: Computer-assisted searches were conducted through March 2017 in the PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Current Contents Connect, KCI and Scielo Citation Index databases. Four sets of keywords were used, combining "neuroanatomy" with "education", "teaching", "learning" and "student*". Studies were reviewed independently by two readers, and data collected were confirmed by a third reader.

Results: Of the 214 studies identified, 29 studies reported data on the impact of using specific neuroanatomy teaching tools. Most of them (83%) were published in the last 8 years and were conducted in the United States of America (65.52%). Regarding the participants, medical students were the most studied sample (37.93%) and the majority of the studies (65.52%) had less than 100 participants. Approximately half of the studies included in this review used digital teaching tools (e.g., 3D computer neuroanatomy models), whereas the remaining used non-digital learning tools (e.g., 3D physical models).

Conclusions: Our work highlight the progressive interest in the study of neuroanatomy teaching tools over the last years, as evidenced from the number of publications and highlight the need to consider new tools, coping with technological development in medical education.

Keywords: Education; Learning; Neuroanatomy; Student; Teaching.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Process applied to identify the manuscripts
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Verhoeven BH, Verwijnen GM, Scherpbier AJJA, Van Der Vleuten CPM. Growth of medical knowledge. Med Educ. 2002;36:711–717. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01268.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dumitrascu DI. Andreas Vesalius şi anatomia umană în Renaştere. [Vesalius and human anatomy in the renaissance] Rev Med Romana. 2014;61(4):332–336.
    1. Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: a historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48(3):153–169. doi: 10.5115/acb.2015.48.3.153. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement for Teaching. New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910. Available from: http://www. carnegiefoundation.org/files/elibrary/Carnegie - PMC - PubMed
    1. Turney BW. Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007;89(2):104–107. doi: 10.1308/003588407X168244. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources