Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May 3;8(1):6985.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25316-9.

Parental perception of listening difficulties: an interaction between weaknesses in language processing and ability to sustain attention

Affiliations

Parental perception of listening difficulties: an interaction between weaknesses in language processing and ability to sustain attention

Hettie Roebuck et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

(Central) auditory processing disorder ((C)APD) is a controversial diagnostic category which may be an artefact of referral route. Yet referral route must, to some extent, be influenced by a child's profile of presenting symptoms. This study tested the hypothesis that parental perception of listening difficulty is associated with weaknesses in ability to sustain attention while listening to speech. Forty-four children (24 with listening difficulties) detected targets embedded in a 16-minute story. The targets were either mispronunciations or nonsense words. Sentence context was modulated to separate out effects due to deficits in language processing from effects due to deficits in attention. Children with listening difficulties missed more targets than children with typical listening abilities. Both groups of children were initially sensitive to sentence context, but this declined over time in the children with listening difficulties. A report-based measure of language abilities captured the majority of variance in a measure capturing time-related changes in sensitivity to context. Overall, the findings suggest parents perceive children to have listening, not language difficulties, because weaknesses in language processing only emerge when stressed by the additional demands associated with attending to, and processing, speech over extended periods of time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Johanna Barry developed the ECLiPS questionnaire.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of context on Percentage Targets Missed (panel A) and Reaction Time (seconds) (panel B) for the children with normal listening abilities (TLi) and the children with listening difficulties (Li-Ref; Li-Nonref). Error bars refer to standard errors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of time-on-task according to Target Type [Predictable (panel A), Nonsense (panel B)], Half [1st Half, 2nd Half] × Group [TLi, LiD]. Error bars refer to standard errors.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Correlation between the Context Sensitivity Change scores, and Language (GCC). GCC <55 indicates significant language difficulty (vertical dotted line). Context Sensitivity Change scores <0 indicate increasingly poor target detection over time.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. British Society of Audiology. Auditory processing disorder, http://www.thebas.org.co.uk/apd/home.htm#working%20def (2007).
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). (Central) auditory processing disorders - the role of the audiologist, http://www.asha.org/NR/rdonlyres/8A2204DE-EE09-443C-98AA-3722C182143E3/0... (2005).
    1. DeBonis DA. It is time to rethink central auditory processing disorder protocols for school-aged children. Am. J. Audiol. 2015;24:124–136. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-14-0037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wilson WJ, Arnott W. Using different criteria to diagnose (central) auditory processing disorder: How big a difference does it make? J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2013;56:63–70. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0352). - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharma M, Purdy S, Kelly AS. Comorbidity of auditory processing, language and reading disorders. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 2009;52:706–722. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/07-0226). - DOI - PubMed

Publication types