Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Aug;26(8):2511-2518.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4227-9. Epub 2018 May 3.

Quality of life in oropharyngeal cancer: a structured review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Quality of life in oropharyngeal cancer: a structured review of the literature

Evelyne Roets et al. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Aug.

Abstract

Purpose: To summarize the literature on quality of life (QoL) in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

Methods: The PubMed database was searched using the inclusion criteria "oropharyngeal cancer," "quality of life," "human," and "English," the exclusion criterion "recurrent," and publication date between January 1, 2005 and October 26, 2015.

Results: The search yielded 98 articles of which 17 fulfilled all selection criteria. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) showed a better outcome for several QoL domains and was superior to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in some studies. At 12-month follow up, deterioration of QoL was seen in a smaller proportion of patients after surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (S&PORT) in comparison to CRT. For all treatment modalities, the most important worsening for several QoL domains was seen at 3 months. Stage III/IV patients experienced a greater deterioration of QoL scores for most scores. No consistent results were reported for the correlation between xerostomia assessed with QoL questionnaires and objective swallowing function assessed with modified barium swallow videofluoroscopy.

Conclusion: The different tools used for the assessment of patient-reported QoL and objective measurement of functional outcome make it difficult to evaluate the effect of different treatment modalities. In general, we can conclude that a non-surgical approach is associated with worse QoL scores. IMRT minimizes radiation to the surrounding tissue and therefore has a better outcome in several QoL domains in comparison to conventional RT.

Keywords: Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT); Dysphagia; Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT); Oropharyngeal cancer; Quality of life; Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Feb;34(1):34-42 - PubMed
    1. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Dec 1;69(5):1354-60 - PubMed
    1. Radiother Oncol. 2013 Mar;106(3):359-63 - PubMed
    1. Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):164-70 - PubMed
    1. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Nov;139(11):1099-108 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources