Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2019 Jan;26(1):143-147.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 May 2.

Subcutaneous Progesterone for Endometrial Polyps in Premenopausal Women: A Preliminary Retrospective Analysis

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Subcutaneous Progesterone for Endometrial Polyps in Premenopausal Women: A Preliminary Retrospective Analysis

Roberta Venturella et al. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Study objective: To investigate the effects of 3 cycles of subcutaneous progesterone administered during the luteal phase on the regression rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic endometrial polyps in premenopausal woman.

Design: A retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).

Setting: A department of obstetrics and gynecology in a university hospital.

Patients: One hundred twenty-seven reproductive-aged women presented with endometrial polyps from January to December 2016.

Interventions: A retrospective comparison of patients treated with subcutaneous progesterone and those managed by the "wait and see" approach.

Measurements and main results: Patients were divided into 2 groups: the group treated with subcutaneous progesterone (cases) and the wait and see group (controls). Women in the treatment group were administered 25 mg subcutaneous progesterone during the luteal phase for 7 days for 3 months. The wait and see group included patients refusing progesterone therapy who were reevaluated 3 menstrual cycles after the transvaginal sonographic diagnosis. Both the treatment group (n = 61) and the wait and see group (n = 32) were evaluated with a follow-up ultrasound examination after 3 months. The regression rate of endometrial polyps in women treated with subcutaneous progesterone was compared with the wait and see patients. The regression in the number and/or dimensions of the polyps was greater in the treatment group than the control group. The regression rate was 47.5% and 12.5%, respectively (p < .001).

Conclusion: Progesterone appears to be a valid therapeutic alternative for the management of endometrial polyps. A prospective, randomized study is ongoing at our institution to further validate these findings.

Keywords: Hysteroscopy; Polyps; Therapeutic strategies; Ultrasound; Wait and see approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types