[Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use]
- PMID: 29731296
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2018.04.003
[Sex and gender equity in research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use]
Abstract
Background: Sex and gender differences are often overlooked in research design, study implementation and scientific reporting, as well as in general science communication. This oversight limits the generalizability of research findings and their applicability to clinical practice, in particular for women but also for men. This article describes the rationale for an international set of guidelines to encourage a more systematic approach to the reporting of sex and gender in research across disciplines.
Methods: A panel of 13 experts representing nine countries developed the guidelines through a series of teleconferences, conference presentations and a 2-day workshop. An internet survey of 716 journal editors, scientists and other members of the international publishing community was conducted as well as a literatura search on sex and gender policies in scientific publishing.
Results: The Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) guidelines are a comprehensive procedure for reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analyses, results and interpretation of findings.
Conclusions: The SAGER guidelines are designed primarily to guide authors in preparing their manuscripts, but they are also useful for editors, as gatekeepers of science, to integrate assessment of sex and gender into all manuscripts as an integral part of the editorial process.
Keywords: Equidad; Equity; Gender; Gender bias; Guidelines; Guías; Género; Investigación científica; Publicación científica; SAGER; Scientific publishing; Scientific research; Sesgo de género; Sex; Sexo.
Copyright © 2018 SESPAS. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
[Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use].Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017 Jul-Sep;26(3):665-675. doi: 10.5123/S1679-49742017000300025. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017. PMID: 28443945 Portuguese.
-
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use.Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016 May 3;1:2. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0007-6. eCollection 2016. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016. PMID: 29451543 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sex And Gender Equity in Research (SAGER): reporting guidelines as a framework of innovation for an equitable approach to gender medicine. Commentary.Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2):154-7. doi: 10.4415/ANN_16_02_05. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2016. PMID: 27364388
-
Reporting sex or gender in anatomical research: Which is appropriate?Clin Anat. 2019 Jul;32(5):697-698. doi: 10.1002/ca.23375. Epub 2019 Mar 30. Clin Anat. 2019. PMID: 30875136
-
Gender perspective in COVID-19. SESPAS Report 2022.Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S26-S29. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.10.005. Gac Sanit. 2022. PMID: 35781144 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
[Biomedical research and innovation and COVID-19 syndemic. SESPAS Report 2022].Gac Sanit. 2022;36 Suppl 1:S87-S92. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2022.02.004. Gac Sanit. 2022. PMID: 35781155 Free PMC article. Review. Spanish.
-
[Myasthenia gravis-Gender aspects and family planning].Nervenarzt. 2024 Apr;95(4):316-328. doi: 10.1007/s00115-024-01640-6. Epub 2024 Mar 18. Nervenarzt. 2024. PMID: 38499774 Review. German.
-
High circulating activin A plasma levels are associated with tumour stage and poor survival in treatment-naive lung squamous cell cancer patients.Transl Oncol. 2025 Jan;51:102153. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2024.102153. Epub 2024 Oct 15. Transl Oncol. 2025. PMID: 39405924 Free PMC article.
-
[Does the Electronic Health Record reflect the social determinants of health from Primary Health Care?].Aten Primaria. 2021 Jan;53(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.01.007. Epub 2020 May 13. Aten Primaria. 2021. PMID: 32417165 Free PMC article. Spanish.
-
Guidance relevant to the reporting of health equity in observational research: a scoping review protocol.BMJ Open. 2022 May 19;12(5):e056875. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056875. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35589369 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources