Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Mar;21(2):314-327.
doi: 10.1017/S1366728917000220. Epub 2017 May 22.

Lexical Access in the Second Year: a Study of Monolingual and Bilingual Vocabulary Development

Affiliations

Lexical Access in the Second Year: a Study of Monolingual and Bilingual Vocabulary Development

Stephanie DeAnda et al. Biling (Camb Engl). 2018 Mar.

Abstract

It is well established that vocabulary size is related to efficiency in auditory processing, such that children with larger vocabularies recognize words faster than children with smaller vocabularies. The present study evaluates whether this relation is specific to the language being assessed, or related to general language or cognitive processes. Speed of word processing was measured longitudinally in Spanish- and English-learning monolinguals and bilinguals at 16 and 22 months of age. Speed of processing in bilinguals was similar to monolinguals, suggesting that the number of languages to which children are exposed does not influence word recognition. Further, cross-language associations in bilinguals suggest that the dominant language supports processing in the non-dominant language. These cross-language associations are consistent with general language and cognitive efficiency accounts in which the relation between word processing and knowledge relies on experience within a language as well as on general and cognitive properties of language learning.

Keywords: Bilinguals; Lexical Access; Toddlers; Vocabulary.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Changes in haptic RT across all groups
Figure 2
Figure 2. Relation between vocabulary size (CCT) and haptic RT (latency) across groups
Figure 3
Figure 3. Regression results for within and cross-language relations between speed of processing and vocabulary size within bilinguals after controlling for age

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. Scope of practice in speech-language pathology. 2007 [Scope of practice]. Available from www.asha.org/policy.http://www.asha.org/Practice/ethics/Cultural-and-Lin...
    1. Arias-Trejo N, Plunkett K. Lexical–semantic priming effects during infancy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 2009;364:3633–3647. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arias-Trejo N, Plunkett K. What’s in a link: Associative and taxonomic priming effects in the infant lexicon. Cognition. 2013;128(2):214–227. - PubMed
    1. Bailey TM, Plunkett K. Phonological specificity in early words. Cognitive Development. 2002;17:1265–1282.
    1. Ballem KD, Plunkett K. Phonological specificity in children at 1; 2. Journal of Child Language. 2005;32:159–173. - PubMed